Am sitting here with my jaws dropped....... The audacity, arrogance and superciliousness of the woman! No wonder we have a problem with the SMC!
I feel for poor Carol!


Mentions ME and claims it is caused by a virus...
https://www.bbc.co.uk/academy/en/articles/art20130702112133756

"Science and the media: Fiona Fox (and the Holy Grail of journalistic balance ......words of wisdom during the BBC interview)

If you aren’t a specialist in a particular area, there’ll always be a lot of people who know more about a subject than you do..... (right on comrade F!)
Fiona Fox is chief executive of the Science Media Centre which provides advice and support to scientists and journalists.

And, quote from talking to the Lancet, Ha! (my emphasis)
"The SMC offers media training for scientists, including meet the media days where they come face-to-face with UK national journalists in an informal setting. Fox and her colleagues also provide expert comment on just about any science or health subject. “There are far less journalists nowadays, but with much more space to fill. By providing them with expert comment, we are giving it to them on a plate—but what they are getting is fair, balanced, journalism”, says Fox........ (Oh no she isn't!)
 
Last edited:
post: 130278 said:
Finally, critics of the Academy recently mocked you as representing ‘Eminence Based’ medicine. Well I for one am delighted to join this ‘eminent’ club. Thanks for letting me in.

Centuries of science have made that point extremely clear: eminence is a lousy system to determine what is true and what isn't and objective science, one that painstakingly acknowledges biases and works hard to reduce their influence on outcome, is the only process that yields useful outcome over the long term. Reality is just not intuitive, you have to seriously poke at it to get the juicy bits of truth out.

And she's proud of rejecting those painful lessons and embracing argument by eminence. Disgraceful. Explains a lot, though. Quite fitting that this is a movement promoting what is essentially a rejection of the germ theory of disease as the foundation of modern medicine, another painfully learned lesson that took centuries to perfect.

[Edit: no politics :p]
 
Last edited:
Anyone have a link to Malcolm Hooper article (c2013)
The SMC and its campaign against MECFS.

I found one link (meactionuk) that doesn't work and another
https://t.co/1hsatWiHb8 which requires FB login
Is this it?

http://www.margaretwilliams.me/2013/role-of-science-media-centre-and-insurance-industry.pdf

"Section 4: The SMC’s campaign against ME/CFS patients"

This is accessible from MEpedia's page (ref 98) ...

https://me-pedia.org/wiki/PACE_trial#Prof_Malcolm_Hooper.27s_complaints
 
From what I can see on Wikipedia I have a suspicion that organisations like Greenpeace may have morphed rather in the way that the Revolutionary Communist Party and SMC have morphed. The original people started going off in weird directions. That may of course be spin but I am not sure. It may be less infiltration with subversives and more infiltration with the usual phoneys. Plus ça change...

Greenpeace have capitulated to corporatism and money spinning and grabbing. They, with 9 other large "charities" "allowed" and endorsed the destruction of a key "Suffolk Coastal local plan protected" wildlife space with 250 community planted trees, badgers and other wildlife in Rushmere and made us take the issue to Judicial Review in 2016. Cost us a packet but one has to stick to one's principles........ At a cost to fight government development policy and corrupt/ biased and twisted judicial system.
 
Finally, critics of the Academy recently mocked you as representing ‘Eminence Based’ medicine. Well I for one am delighted to join this ‘eminent’ club. Thanks for letting me in.


In Oscar Wilde's "The Picture of Dorian Gray," Lord Wotton says that he likes to choose his enemies for their good intellects. Unfortunately, even in this regard, it looks like ME patients are once again screwed.
 
Back
Top Bottom