1. Guest, 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 14th September 2020 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

Issues reported about the Science Media Centre (SMC), not just ME-related

Discussion in 'Advocacy Projects and Campaigns' started by Barry, Mar 24, 2018.

  1. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,024
    Likes Received:
    39,535
    @Sly Saint 's post here ...

    https://www.s4me.info/threads/scien...ss-and-the-controversy.3104/page-6#post-56250

    ... makes me realise the SMC's dodgy science collation is by no means confined to just ME issues, and there might well be a lot of other science sectors in the same boat with them.

    So please keep this thread on track, and post links, with relevant chat if on track, of any reports you come across about the SMC's unwarranted influence on science reporting and debate. Like I say, not confined to ME ... any science, any unwarranted influence.
     
    Last edited: Mar 24, 2018
  2. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,024
    Likes Received:
    39,535
    From 2014:

    https://www.scidev.net/global/journ...-lambasted-for-pushing-corporate-science.html

    Plus lots more. It's a good read.
     
  3. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,024
    Likes Received:
    39,535
    Corrected.

    When I looked through all the forum headings, this was the only one I could see that it seemed to fit in. Suggested alternative welcomed. Or maybe we need another public forum? Moderators please move if appropriate.
     
    Melanie and adambeyoncelowe like this.
  4. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    7,471
    Likes Received:
    76,421
    People involved in SMC have a track record of odd political affiliations and strange angles on things like GM, global warming, tobacco, animal rights etc etc. Dr Paul has some inside knowledge of the community involved and seemed to think that in most cases it did not matter too much but that the bias relating to ME was a real problem.
     
    Joel, Milo, ukxmrv and 6 others like this.
  5. hinterland

    hinterland Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    237
    Likes Received:
    1,359
    As the authors of the recent PACE reanalysis paper (BMC Psychology) have pointed out, there is no right of reply to SMC ‘expert reaction’ briefings.

    I think there is scope for someone to set up a dedicated website providing authors with a right of reply to SMC opinion that is presented as ‘the final word’.
     
  6. Adrian

    Adrian Administrator Staff Member

    Messages:
    4,748
    Likes Received:
    24,000
    Location:
    UK
    Amw66, NelliePledge, Skycloud and 9 others like this.
  7. Lidia

    Lidia Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    148
    Likes Received:
    960
    This one is my favourite:
    Seeding Doubt
    How Self-Appointed Guardians of “Sound Science” Tip the Scales Toward Industry
    https://theintercept.com/2016/11/15...sound-science-tip-the-scales-toward-industry/
     
    ukxmrv, adambeyoncelowe and Inara like this.
  8. April

    April Established Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    276
    For further information about the Science Media Centre and ME/CFS have a look at the paper by Prof Malcolm Hooper from 1st September 2013 entitled Role of the Science Media Centre and the Insurance Industry. This is to be found at www.margaretwilliams.me
     
  9. Forbin

    Forbin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,159
    Likes Received:
    8,405
    They produce a handy flier entitled:

    Advice for Researchers Experiencing Harassment
    http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Advice-for-researchers-experiencing-harrassment-2013.pdf

     
  10. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,024
    Likes Received:
    39,535
    "people who have extreme views about their research" ... like, that it should fulfil the fundamental requirement of being good science ... I mean, how extreme is that!
     
  11. Sean

    Sean Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,539
    Likes Received:
    20,863
    Accountability always seems 'extreme' to those wishing to avoid it.
     
  12. It's M.E. Linda

    It's M.E. Linda Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    491
    Likes Received:
    3,793
  13. chrisb

    chrisb Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,856
    Likes Received:
    19,364
    Does the Advice for researchers experiencing harassment include advice for SW to avoid Australia?We know of his concerns about ball tampering.

    Edit perhaps that should include EC, for reasons that are entirely beyond me.
     
  14. adambeyoncelowe

    adambeyoncelowe Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,190
    Likes Received:
    15,504
    It's shocking. Likening sick people who want to get better to climate change deniers and animal rights activists. It's beyond offensive. If they said the same things about black or LGBT rights campaigners, they'd be rightly lambasted. Why does this go unchallenged just because they're dissing disabled people?

    The societal problem with the BPS model (beyond the flaws in science, I mean) is that it's inherently ableist. If you can't heal, it's your own fault. If you're chronically ill, you didn't try hard enough. If you claim benefits, you're playing the sick roll. It's always disabled people who are to blame, and if we speak out about this, we're maligned as militants.
     
  15. Chezboo

    Chezboo Established Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    28
    Likes Received:
    262
    This from 2017. It is a thorough investigation into the SMC, it's background and operation with a focus on examples of its bias. Includes some interesting quotes and links to other pieces.


    "Does Science Media Centre Promote Corporate Views of Science?"
    By Stacy Malkan in US RTK

    https://usrtk.org/our-investigations/science-media-centre/
     
  16. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    7,471
    Likes Received:
    76,421
    Thanks, that seems quite comprehensive.

    Of course we are all aware of corporate corruption. The interest in the SMC is the apparent hypocrisy - the claim of being pro bono public when in fact the opposite be true.

    With the current UK and US governments there seems to be no reason to think anyone in government would care about such hypocrisy. They make no claim to be guardians of the public good. And the alternative seems to be steeped in hypocrisy - as in Tony Blair taking a ride in Bernie Ecclestone's car.

    I have put it in the notebook.
     
    Suffolkres, Jan, NelliePledge and 8 others like this.
  17. Arnie Pye

    Arnie Pye Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,080
    Likes Received:
    16,862
    Location:
    UK
    I have just read this quote from the article :

    My perception of current news :

    I remember years ago (in the 1990s and before?) that Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth would often be quoted in articles or would appear in interviews on the news. But they appear to have vanished off the face of the earth, based on the news programs I see on British TV and what I read in British newspapers on or offline nowadays. The same is true of Amnesty International - another group that would be mentioned quite often in years gone by, who now are almost never mentioned.
     
  18. It's M.E. Linda

    It's M.E. Linda Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    491
    Likes Received:
    3,793
    One such quote from Prof Malcolm Hooper:

    “Discrediting Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

    A 2013 paper by Malcolm Hooper, Emeritus Professor of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Sunderland, UK, reported evidence that SMC promoted the views of certain psychiatrists while ignoring other evidence that contradicted the psychiatrists’ theory, in an effort to discredit people with ME/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.

    “For those not blinded by the SMC’s dazzling aura, it appears that its covert purpose is to ensure that journalists and the media report scientific and medical matters only in a way that conforms to government and industry’s ‘policy’ on the issues in question.”

    “An organisation which behaves in such a blatantly unscientific way can have no legitimate claim to represent science.” “
     
  19. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,024
    Likes Received:
    39,535
    It would be great for the SMC to get investigated regarding this in due course. But if, as many of us have suspected along the way, the SMC has indeed be covertly nurtured by forces aligned with government/industry ambitions, there will be equally strong forces lining up to prevent that.
     
  20. Snow Leopard

    Snow Leopard Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,105
    Likes Received:
    13,562
    Location:
    Australia
    Yes, it's funny how BPS in practise means psychological therapy. The external social/societal issues that hold disabled people back are rarely if ever challenged, even though that is a central pillar of BPS...
     
    Inara, It's M.E. Linda, Sean and 6 others like this.

Share This Page