I do wish sub-editors or editors would not insist on inserting themselves into the script. Where does that "purported" come from, before the respiratory infection? It may be other things in addition, but there seems to be nothing "purported" about it. I read the piece expecting an explanation. Finding none suggests that the editorial team wishes to cast doubts
There is no editorial or sub editorial control over these blogs on the Psychology Today blog platform. The article won't have been commissioned by Psychology Today.
Bloggers own the content on their blog platforms. They can edit articles, take them down entirely, or take any comments off and set a blog as "No Comments" if they don't like the comments they are receiving (as Ned Shorter did in 2015 - first he set the blog so no further comments could be posted on that blog, then he took his hate piece down and later published a slightly toned down commentary).
There are hundreds of these blogs for several countries and they are on a stand alone platform to the content of the Psychology Today magazine. The bloggers are subject to Terms of Use - but otherwise the owners of these blogs can publish whatever they like.
Dr Allen Frances' blog
DSM5 in Distress is on the UK blogger platform, so is Edward Shorter's blog.
Toni Bernhard (How to Be Sick) has one.
They are a means of providing psychologists, psychiatrists, therapists, counsellors and mental health advocates with a platform to promote their practices, publications, online courses, online therapy etc.
Edited to add:
Emily Deans, M.D., is a board certified adult psychiatrist practicing in Massachusetts. She graduated from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School in 2000 and from the Harvard Longwood Psychiatry Residency in 2004, and was a Chief Resident at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston. She is currently an Instructor in Psychiatry, Part-Time at Harvard Medical School. This blog has no affiliation with and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of the institution.