From doctors as patients: a manifesto for tackling persisting symptoms of covid-19
https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3565
We write as a group of doctors affected by persisting symptoms of suspected or confirmed covid-19. We aim to share our insights from both personal experience of the illness and our perspective as physicians.
Tackling this problem will involve collaboration between politicians, healthcare services, public health professionals, scientists, and society. We call for the following principles to be used so that the best possible outcomes can be achieved for all people affected by persisting symptoms of covid-19.
Further down it cites "no decision without me" yet doesn't even include the patients here... ugh. We are excluded from society, so it doesn't include us.
The effects of the virus should be studied in the way that any other disease would be, with thorough attention paid to epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management.
But. Many diseases aren't studied. In fact it's precisely why something that has been happening constantly for decades is "taking medicine by surprise". That's literally the problem here: not all diseases are equal and some are fully discriminated against. The regular way of doing things is what broke here. Medicine has explicitly refused to do this despite consistent demands and clear evidence for decades. As a choice. We have been begging for this and it's constantly rejected with prejudice. Again: as a choice. People chose this and imposed this choice on us. Blame them, your colleagues, they deserve the hell out of it.
Failure to understand the underlying biological mechanisms causing these persisting symptoms risks missing opportunities to identify risk factors, prevent chronicity, and find treatment approaches for people affected now and in the future.
This is completely incompatible with the BPS/FND/MUS thing that has captured medicine over the last few decades. So incompatible in fact that only one of those things is possible. As long as this ideology remains, none of this will happen. This is why it did not happen over the last few decades and we are stuck in this situation where medicine is constantly "surprised" by things that happen every single day.
Where current guidance has been issued, such as the statement from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
5 cautioning against graded exercise therapy in the context of covid-19, it should be communicated quickly to clinicians on the front line.
NICE did not caution against GET. It fact they issued a statement afterward emphasizing that. It merely said it should not be assumed GET would be used. It currently is, as we knew it would. And NICE can't recommend against GET for COVID-19 while keeping it for ME so they can't do that yet, too much escalation of commitment, too many egos and careers to protect.
“No decision without me”
6—lessons learnt from other illnesses have shown the importance of involving those most affected.
Hi. We need to talk. Like, right fucking now. You speak of lessons. What lessons? Medicine is still in the business of maligning chronic illnesses and lying about us, not learning a damn thing by ignoring everything we say and trampling over explicit rejection of consent. There are no such lessons learned, in fact we are in the era of maximum failure on this regard. The lesson NEEDS to be learned but, again, too much escalation of commitment and egos and careers and so on. Ask the patients. Hell, we left a long public record, one that is completely ignored and dismissed with prejudice. One that you yourselves would have dismissed had you not been caught in this dystopian nightmare with the rest of us.
This is a nice sentiment and is basically exactly what the ME community has been begging for decades. But it is incredibly naive of the current context that leads to medicine, again, being "surprised" every time by something that has been happening every day for decades. It completely ignores the context of BPS/MUS/FND that makes this plan a non-starter without a massive reform of medicine that has to acknowledge massive widespread failure that destroyed millions of lives, knowingly, on purely ideological grounds.
This is a good recipe for solving this but the system can't do this right now. Not without massive changes. Not without recognizing that for all those good ideas, every last one of them, medicine is currently incapable of delivering and in fact has refused to do so aggressively for decades. Because medicine doesn't do that "no decision without us" thing. It's not a thing. It's how it should work, but the opposite of how it works right now. What this describes is what gets people discharged for being "non-compliant".
Context matters. There is huge context behind this, all of it is not acknowledged, let alone taken into consideration. That the obvious precedent of ME/CFS and other chronic illnesses isn't even acknowledged here does not inspire confidence, especially on the question of "lessons learned". Medicine doesn't learn lessons from patients, stubbornly so. The patients can tell you that, but they weren't even included in the list of stakeholders. Everything has to change. Literally everything.
This article is discussed further here:
BMJ letter from LongCovid doctors.