If you are a GP and dealing with people with this fatigue, please note my personal experience that Pacing is essential, and GET is harmful.”
Professor Paul Garner
Professor Paul Garner.
Professor Paul Garner, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, made the following comments to 10,000 UK doctors on Covid-19 forum at the weekend:
“Colleagues, clearly in ‘long haul’ COVID there is a spectrum of symptoms, conditions, damage and need for recovery.
“Personally, I have noted how often the illness symptoms recur if I do too much physical activity or mental activity (I am now on day 114) and how this can be mitigated by careful Pacing, as defined by the CFS/ME literature.
“I also believe many ‘long hauler’ patients don’t realise this relationship of relapse with exertion (although I know it doesn’t apply to all).
“The CURRENT UK NICE Guidelines are 13 years old. They recommend Graded Exercise Therapy; and for Pacing, they say ‘health care professionals should advise people with CFS/ME that, at present, there is insufficient research evidence on the benefits and harms of Pacing,’ (NICE, 2007).
“On Friday afternoon, NICE posted an unsigned PDF saying that, in the context of GET, ‘it should not be assumed that the recommendations apply to people with fatigue following Covid-19’. They make no statement about Pacing.
“I am concerned this confusion risks sending muddled messages to GPs. I respect GPs though are good at making up their own minds about these things!
“If you are a GP and dealing with people with this fatigue, please note my personal experience that Pacing is essential, and GET is harmful.
“And more broadly as a community of doctors, can we somehow push for clearer guidance for us all, with useful materials? With my Covid-19 fog, cutting through the plethora of advice about Pacing on the internet is a bit overwhelming!”