cassava7
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
What irritates me isn't so much the adoption of useful terms, but the lack of acknowledgement of the source.
I agree. I’m not against the appropriation at all, I would only like that people with ME be acknowledged when these terms are used. On the other hand, it is likely that some people with Long Covid have heard about them second hand, so, setting aside the stigma of ME/CFS, I understand that the connection isn’t generally being made.I find this use of the term 'appropriation' strange in this context, and don't blame people, struggling and very sick like us, for wanting to tell their stories in the media. It's not their fault pwME have been shamefully neglected, nor that terms and images used in ME/CFS are useful for them too. After all, it seems likely many using the terms like energy envelope and using battery analogies fit the ME/CFS diagnostic criteria too, so using images use in ME/CFS seems sensible. Whatever terms patients with any disease find useful seems legitimate to me.
However I am angry at doctors who persist in dismissing ME/CFS as irrelevant, and who suggest it's just fatigue and therefore different from the long Covid patients with PEM and other ME/CFS symptoms.
How the consequences of the historical framing of ME as chronic fatigue keep unfolding, this time separating LC from ME because the latter is not perceived as a multi systemic disease, is baffling.