1. Guest, our 'News in Brief' post for w/c 10th June can be found by clicking here.
    Dismiss Notice

FITNET-NHS Esther Crawley - 5th protocol out now

Discussion in 'PsychoSocial ME/CFS Research' started by daftasabrush, Feb 7, 2019.

  1. daftasabrush

    daftasabrush Established Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    58
    Likes Received:
    185
    How many protocols does this harmful GET trial need exactly? There's 5 on the website now.

    Is Action for ME supporting this street merging with AYME? They have a clear statement against GET now.

    Selected GPs are now sending out letters on behalf Crawley et al for any kids aged 11+. For 16 or 17 year olds "invitations" go straight to the kids rather than parents. Since the protocol involves including reasons for refusal, does that mean GPs pass on data directly? Surely that can't be allowed?

    Will GPs be informed Crawley is under investigation for ethics violations at Bristol?

    I haven't managed to figure out all the differences from earlier protocols.

    Obviously still the Oxford criteria.
    Also only looking for those "recently" diagnosed...no doubt to bump up recovery rates.

    £900,000 to manipulate and harm hey more children. ;-(

    https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/programmes/hta/14192109/
     
    Lidia, MEMarge, Inara and 9 others like this.
  2. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,474
    Likes Received:
    7,252
    At the end, there is a section:
    which goes through the various changes for the different protocols.
     
  3. Michiel Tack

    Michiel Tack Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    752
    Likes Received:
    6,917
    Location:
    Belgium
    Crawley uses the NICE-criteria. From the protocol:
     
    MEMarge, Esther12, Andy and 5 others like this.
  4. Suffolkres

    Suffolkres Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    582
    Likes Received:
    2,872
    There is another issue here. If the children and Young people being contacted "For 16 or 17 year olds "invitations" go straight to the kids", -if they have a diagnosis and are, or have been out of school, other agencies will be involved and they may come under the heading of 'vulnerable" or 'disabled' young people.

    Then there is then the issue of Mental capacity and Deprivation of Liberty( DOLs) complication and potential.
     
    ukxmrv, MEMarge, daftasabrush and 3 others like this.
  5. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,045
    Likes Received:
    25,638
    Location:
    UK
    Apart from saying that MJW had quit, they don't appear to have amended their info re AYME.
    Don't they have to inform anyone that they no longer have the backing of a patient charity?
    Or maybe they do?

    And the APPG no longer exists(?) and the MPs who are part of the CMRC(?)
    But the last line is the most concerning.
     
    Last edited: Feb 7, 2019
    ukxmrv, daftasabrush, MEMarge and 3 others like this.
  6. Adrian

    Adrian Administrator

    Messages:
    3,803
    Likes Received:
    17,973
    Location:
    UK
    From the amendment list

    Not quite sure what this means but I wonder if it is the trick of using pilot patients in a full trial?
     
    Lidia, daftasabrush, Amw66 and 5 others like this.
  7. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    12,996
    Likes Received:
    71,355
    Location:
    UK
    Is it normal for a clinical trial protocol to discuss plans for dissemination of the results beyond scientific journal publication?

    From what I remember of looking at FITNET, and I don't have the energy to go back and look at it and study the protocols, the trial is designed as a win-win, since it has no control group, but has two active treatment groups receiving different variations on internet supported GET/activity management/CBT. Whichever group comes out ahead in the results will be claimed as an effective treatment.
     
    MEMarge, rvallee, obeat and 2 others like this.
  8. Adrian

    Adrian Administrator

    Messages:
    3,803
    Likes Received:
    17,973
    Location:
    UK
    I suspect so I know with other government funded research they like to have dissemination plans to communicate the main ideas with a variety of different stakeholders through many sources.
     
  9. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    13,211
    Location:
    Canada
    Nice haul for someone who had claimed to have left the field because of all the "harassment".

    Seems instead she found a more easily abusable population, one that will comply and not complain, especially with threats of FII on parents.

    Science without a moral compass is bad for society. Always has. Always will.
     
    EzzieD, Tilly, Starlight and 6 others like this.
  10. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    13,211
    Location:
    Canada
    PACE team made plans for the media blitz in coordination with the (totally neutral and objective) SMC and the Lancet during the trial, showing the results were pre-determined and would have had no impact on their conclusions. So I guess it's normalized now.

    This is carry-the-football "research", where success is defined merely by the act of successfully publishing something and the substance is irrelevant, only the conclusions, which can be anything they want to apparently, no matter what the data show.
     
    Unable, MEMarge and ScottTriGuy like this.
  11. Lacey Diamond

    Lacey Diamond Established Member

    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    96
    It's important to note that their "activity management" is also an increasing regimen but not quite as rigid as GET. My daughter has had this and there is an expectation that she would try to increase 15 minutes of red activity every week if there is no set-back. Needless to say she reached a level of activity that she could no longer increase and that was the end of it. I have heard similar reports from other parents. They do not seem to be specifically stating what they mean by these interventions and then clouding the picture by renaming things.
     
    Tilly, MEMarge, Sly Saint and 11 others like this.
  12. obeat

    obeat Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    378
    Likes Received:
    2,620
    Do you know if your daughter will be classified as " recovered" or improved ?
     
    MEMarge and Lidia like this.
  13. Tilly

    Tilly Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    152
    Likes Received:
    883
    NICE have said that they do not give a criteria for diagnosis so how can she use it?
     
  14. Tilly

    Tilly Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    152
    Likes Received:
    883
    This is done more by the RCPCH and the police involvement and they only have to site possible emotional harm now as a reason. Withholding the chance of recovery is used as a possible emotional harm.
     
    MEMarge and Amw66 like this.
  15. Amw66

    Amw66 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,722
    Likes Received:
    9,995
    So that was what the safeguarding seminar was really all about ?
     
    Tilly and MEMarge like this.
  16. chrisb

    chrisb Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,801
    Likes Received:
    12,545
    One has to wonder whether, in this matter, they show "equipoise". Removing a child from parents and home also causes emotional trauma. How are the contrasting traumas evaluated and compared?
     
    MEMarge and rvallee like this.

Share This Page