spinoza577
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
I think they don´t manage to grasp the nature of PEM.... They have non-physical PEM triggers on the slide, which is good. What I don't understand is if they also view non-physical triggers in terms of anaerobic thresholds being passed, e.g. brain cells working so hard that their broken aerobic system can't deal with it (that's if brain cells even have such a system?)? Or do they assume a different mechanism for non-physical triggers but don't go into it because that's not their specialty?
Should the immediate symptoms listed - fatigue, shortness of breath, dizziness, nausea - be considered part of PEM?
...
Another slide at 39:25 comparing healthy, ME baseline, ME PEM, and deconditioned is good. I still wonder if certain people who shall remain nameless would try to twist it to say that we're not only deconditioned but extremely deconditioned? They'd have to explain the difference between baseline and PEM: can we really get that much more deconditioned overnight? - but they'd probably just ignore that little problem of logic.
It is rather a pattern of occurence (of symptoms), not a pattern of concrete symptoms.
The CCC may serve a confusion, as they give an alternative to PEM called PEF. "Malaise" obviously referres to symptoms felt in the body, whereas "Fatique" is obviously suggested to describe mental disabilities. This might be not too stupid, but key is obviously that these both areas of symptoms occur in an exaggerated manner and possibly delayed.
Looking at this I find it a bit bold to talk about anaerobic threshhold as an explanation. Better would be to ask in which place (in the body) these two areas are connected.