USA: NIH National Institutes of Health news - latest ME/CFS webinar 14 Jan 2025

Registration is available for the next webinar.

Less Studied Pathologies: ME/CFS Research Roadmap Working Group of Council Webinar 7 of 8 - Jan 5, https://roseliassociates.zoomgov.com/webinar/register/WN_c0WYA2I6SRyV_nBGpSWWGw#/registration

Ilene Ruhoy MD PhD posted on Twitter
"Register now for the January 5th NIH NINDS MECFS research webinar series. I’ll be discussing the state of research and what we need to know and do now on connective tissue disorders and cranial cervical instability."

 




Tess Falor, Ph.D. | @RemissionBiome
"Additional info from Beth: it's actually going to be a lot more than #MEspine! "Less Studied Pathologies in ME/CFS. Topics include connective tissue disorders; spinal conditions; MCAS; gastrointestinal conditions; neuroendocrinology; & reproductive health"

---------------------------------------

Tess Falor, Ph.D. | @RemissionBiome
@tessfalor


This is going to be a great webinar! Huge to Beth for making this happen. Please register & attend. Let's show that the community wants research into #MEspine structural neurological conditions. #CCI #AAI #TetheredCord #IntracranialHypertension #CSFleaks Thanks in advance to
@julierehmeyer
@RuhoyMD
& others for presenting.

------------------------------------

Julie Rehmeyer
@julierehmeyer
·
Jan 3
Guys, this is what I'm speaking at Friday. Note that it's free, but you have to register at the link below. Beth Pollack, Ilene Ruhoy, Anne Maitland, Petra Klinge, Laura Pace, Emelia von Saltza, Roumiana Boneva, and Elizabeth Unger are all speaking. It's going to be great.
 
I have to disagree. Collins became Director in 2009. ME was sabotaged long before that. He did not do even remotely as much as we would have liked him to do. But in 2009 when he came in, we were bogged down in the XMRV debacle. ( For those of you who missed XMRV, just be happy.) We had less than $4 million in funding, a good hunk of which went toward psychological studies. We had people in dentistry and other crazy areas evaluating research proposals.

At the end of his term, researcher funding is still too small, but it’s 4 times higher. We have 3 Cooperative Research Centers doing good work, along with a Data Center. We had a major conference at NIH a couple of years ago. The research that is funded now is all high quality research by good researchers. He assigned Dr Nath, one of his best guys, to do the intramural study which, although it was cut short by the pandemic, has started to publish its findings. He met personally with some of the participants in the study - the head of NIH doesn’t usually do something like that. He also met with representatives of ME Action and the head of NIH doesn’t do that either. There is now a special panel of experts that evaluates our research. I’m leaving out some things, I’m sure.

Did he do everything that I hoped that he would do? No. Did he do what we desperately need to have done? Not even close. He took the NIH approach, which is to move slowly, evaluate, then take a few more steps. That’s not just for us - it’s for everyone. But to blame him for things that he’s not responsible for isn’t fair. He acknowledges that this is a multisystemic biomedical illness that should be taken seriously.

I truly wish that he had implemented the great suggestions that were in the letter presented to him by ME Action. He took the NIH slow approach instead. But I don’t think that there is any question that he did more than any previous Director to move this disease forward in a sound scientific manner.

I spoke at NIH for the first time in 1992. I have watched NIH very closely since I was diagnosed in 1988. Dr. Collins could have done a lot more. We need a strategic plan, backed up by serious, set-aside funding. We need clinical trials of treatments. We need a whole lot to get out of the hole that we are in. But Dr Collins did not dig that hole. He gave us a little boost toward the surface. I hope that the next Director can do more to get us out.
Thanks Wilhelmina - do you know if we can make suggestions re research NIH should fund (following these webinars)? E.g. the genomics/genetics talk had references to studies of families with multiple members affected - as a way to find rare alleles which cause disease in those individuals & potentially the pathology in a wider group. Can we suggest/promote ideas like that i.e. genetic studies of families with multiple members affected?
@SimonMcGrath @JonathanEdwards
 
Last edited:
Thanks Wilhelmina - do you know if we can make suggestions re research NIH should fund (following these webinars)? E.g. the genomics/genetics talk had references to studies of families with multiple members affected - as a way to find rare alleles which cause disease in those individuals & potentially the pathology in a wider group. Can we suggest/promote ideas like that i.e. genetic studies of families with multiple members affected?
@SimonMcGrath @JonathanEdwards
Decided to post this on Twitter i.e. and tag NIH -
@SimonMcGrath @Wilhelmina Jenkins
"
Replying to
@LauraAPace
@NIH
@NIH_NINDS
Genetic studies on families with more than 1 member affected by ME/CFS (preferably with at least 1 member severe) - looking for rare variants. This offers potential to identify cause in much wider group.
@SnowyPanthera
@sjmnotes
@SabineHermisson
 
Recording of NIH #MECFS Research Roadmap: Circulation Webinar is now available

Speakers included: Vicky Whittemore; Gwynn Dujardin; Jane Mitchell; Resia Pretorius; Frans Visser; Linda Van Campen; Jiandi Wan; David Systrom
Has anyone watched Jiandi Wan's section (starts 2:28)?

I watched a bit mainly because the name was unfamiliar which made me curious. Turns out he presents quite a bit of unpublished data but I struggled to follow it though I gather red blood cell deformability is still or again on the agenda

According to Wikipedia the drugs mentioned in the slide below are a long-acting β 2 adrenergic receptor agonist used in asthma and COPD (Salmeterol) and a small molecule muscarinic acetylcholine receptor agonist (Xanomeline). I didn't catch why they were chosen

And I'm guessing(!) PO2 stands for partial pressure of oxygen, i.e. how much oxygen gas is dissolved in the blood

ETA: copied to this thread https://www.s4me.info/threads/impai...od-cells-from-me-cfs-wan-nih-talk-2024.37123/ for discussion of this specific presentation
RBC velocity talk conclusion slide.JPG
 
Last edited:
News from NIH: NINDS is seeking feedback on ME/CFS Research Roadmap Priorities

NINDS is seeking your input on the ME/CFS Research Roadmap priorities. The goal is to collect broad feedback from the public on the research priorities being developed by the Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) Research Roadmap Working Group of Council that will result in a report presented to the National Advisory Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NANDS) Council in May 2024.


The public comment period is now open and is scheduled to close on March 8, 2024. We encourage stakeholders to review all of the priorities and comment on as few or as many as each individual or organization prefers.


Comments may include input on how the draft research priorities could be enhanced, new research questions that could be included, or challenges that the current research priorities may face.


Comments will be public so please do not include any personal and/or medical information.


To submit feedback, visit the IdeaScale website

To learn how to use the IdeaScale website, watch this instructional video


To learn more about the ME/CFS Research Roadmap and to view the research webinars, visit: https://www.ninds.nih.gov/about-nin...l/nandsc-mecfs-research-roadmap-working-group

If you have any questions regarding the Research Roadmap process or IdeaScale, email MECFSResearchRoadmap@ninds.nih.gov

 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom