Reports from participants in GET and CBT trials
- Thread starter Hutan
- Start date
Section 2: adding insult to injury to have named it the 'PACE' trial — sowing confusion, such that the interviewer and even the patient are calling GET "pacing".
Sly Saint
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Barry
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
This epitomises how PACE was not a clinical trial but a show trial ...
This must be borderline criminal behaviour, given this was a clinical trial of human subjects. Let alone the brazen intent to distort the evidence, which should also be seen as criminal. Ignoring the potential risk of human harm, and striving to ensure fraudulent outcomes. These people should have been barred long ago from undertaking such work, especially those applying pressure from above. They need some of their own medicine.
This must be borderline criminal behaviour, given this was a clinical trial of human subjects. Let alone the brazen intent to distort the evidence, which should also be seen as criminal. Ignoring the potential risk of human harm, and striving to ensure fraudulent outcomes. These people should have been barred long ago from undertaking such work, especially those applying pressure from above. They need some of their own medicine.
Last edited:
I would go further. It wasn't bad science, it wasn't even non-science. It was anti-science.
A number of posts have been moved to Similarities between the tobacco industry and BPS/insurance interests