1. Click here, Guest, and read the 'News in Brief' post for w/c 15th July.
    Dismiss Notice

Persistent fatigue induced by interferon-alpha: A novel, inflammation-based, proxy model of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, 2018, Pariante et al

Discussion in 'BioMedical ME/CFS Research' started by MeSci, Dec 4, 2018.

  1. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,677
    Likes Received:
    74,902
    Location:
    UK
    Discussion of this blog starts here post #172
     
    ladycatlover and Hutan like this.
  2. Lucibee

    Lucibee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    932
    Likes Received:
    9,737
    Location:
    Mid-Wales
    There is a lot of muddy water about...

    Pariante said: "We’ve been able to use a group of people that have a high risk of developing chronic fatigue syndrome, in this case, following an activation of the immune system through a medication that they take for a therapeutic purpose, which in reality is very similar to what happens to many patients at the time at which they have a strong viral infection."

    He seems to be using the laxity of Oxford to create a false equivalence between the two groups. He's also quite careful in interviews not to mention HCV. As far as I'm aware, there is no evidence that those with HCV are at a higher risk of developing CFS or ME. If there were, that really *would* be interesting.
     
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2018
    ladycatlover, Sean, Mithriel and 10 others like this.
  3. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,119
    Likes Received:
    26,344
    Location:
    UK
    Pretty sickening all the articles on this research all over the web with 'ME patients are not just Lazy' as heading .
     
  4. Cheshire

    Cheshire Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    1,812
    Likes Received:
    13,522
    And Pariante retweeting...
     
    Chezboo, ladycatlover, Inara and 9 others like this.
  5. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,119
    Likes Received:
    26,344
    Location:
    UK
    he would pick possibly the worst paper to retweet:banghead:

    eta: also Pariante may be an expert in something but NOT in ME/CFS
     
  6. chrisb

    chrisb Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,882
    Likes Received:
    12,993
    Is that deliberate or naïve?
     
  7. ScottTriGuy

    ScottTriGuy Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    471
    Likes Received:
    4,125
    Location:
    Toronto
    "ME patients AREN'T just lazy..."

    "just" is ringing in my ears.

    The 'just' leaves the door open to 'also' having false illness belief / malingerers / etc.
     
  8. Andy

    Andy Committee Member & Outreach

    Messages:
    6,766
    Likes Received:
    50,249
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    A Reddit thread on one of the media articles about this paper. Surprisingly the majority of comments that I looked at are reasonable.
     
    ladycatlover, EzzieD, Sean and 7 others like this.
  9. strategist

    strategist Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,661
    Likes Received:
    16,676
    A person on reddit (not a patient it seems) commented on this study:

    Apparently it's not just us vexatious patients that have a problem with it.
     
  10. Andy

    Andy Committee Member & Outreach

    Messages:
    6,766
    Likes Received:
    50,249
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    Given that the Science Media Centre, a charity whose charity listing, http://beta.charitycommission.gov.uk/charity-details/?subid=0&regid=1140827, claims that it's purpose is to (sorry, all caps is how it is on the website)
    could a complaint be raised, highlighting the inaccuracies of the media coverage inspired by their briefing? And if we could ever get a copy of the briefing itself, to fact check that, would be great, and would make any complaint made even more accurate.
     
    Chezboo, ladycatlover, EzzieD and 7 others like this.
  11. ScottTriGuy

    ScottTriGuy Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    471
    Likes Received:
    4,125
    Location:
    Toronto
    Is this what I'm seeing?

    Scientific perception = nothing new really in the paper

    Media / Public perception = paper says CFS is real and not imagined, inferring patients can now be believed
     
  12. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,119
    Likes Received:
    26,344
    Location:
    UK
    I was thinking the same and trying to find out who it would be addressed to and came across this:
    https://www.s4me.info/posts/130195/
     
  13. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,677
    Likes Received:
    74,902
    Location:
    UK
    The thing I find most astonishing about this whole episode is the power of the Science Media Centre to dictate news coverage. I've been collating the news articles so far, planning to list them in the News in Brief this week, but there are too many, so I'm putting them here instead:

     
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2018
    Lisa108, Chezboo, Cinders66 and 24 others like this.
  14. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,119
    Likes Received:
    26,344
    Location:
    UK
    It's going to get worse as there are 'branches' of the SMC in other countries and presumably they pass on their releases.

    eta: I see the ME Association are also retweeting all the various articles (although have not spotted the ones with the Sun headline yet)



    Michael Sharpe adding his words of wisdom:rolleyes:
     
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2018
    ladycatlover, EzzieD, Inara and 7 others like this.
  15. Peter Trewhitt

    Peter Trewhitt Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    764
    Likes Received:
    7,676
    Here is the Sun link, this is their Irish site, shared by Tom Kindlon on Facebook, I don't know if they also have a seperate link on their English site:

    https://www.thesun.ie/fabulous/3531...ence-of-what-causes-chronic-fatigue-syndrome/
     
    ladycatlover, MEMarge and Trish like this.
  16. NelliePledge

    NelliePledge Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,060
    Likes Received:
    21,761
    Location:
    UK East Midlands
    Dunno about others but I’ve decided I’m not sharing links to any of this stuff. Albeit that’s only a small gesture due to my limited social media presence i don’t feel i want to contribute clicks to their hype.
     
  17. Robert 1973

    Robert 1973 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    425
    Likes Received:
    5,468
    Location:
    UK
    Funny that – when I think of the SMC, dysentery comes to mind.

    I was tempted to reply to Pariante’s tweet by saying: “This article appears to show that Pariente et al AREN’T just a bunch of incompetent f@#&wits.” But I decided that discretion might be the better part of valour.

    I see that The Sun article is just a reproduction of The a Conversation article written by Pariante and Russell. I was pleased to see that it included a photograph of an immaculately coiffed young male model yawning, Cher, and a young woman lying down in bra and knickers – just in case any readers were left with any uncertainty about the seriousness of “CFS” (https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/8008914/chronic-fatigue-syndrome-biological-causes/).
     
  18. Kalliope

    Kalliope Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,054
    Likes Received:
    21,199
    Location:
    Norway
    Seems he got some reactions on twitter..
     
    Lisa108, ladycatlover, EzzieD and 6 others like this.
  19. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,523
    Likes Received:
    7,424
    I don’t think their actions here were particularly bad (though we can be cynical about their motives).

    I would feel much more comfortable if they were challenged on another action by them which would better exemplify their bias.
     
  20. SallyC

    SallyC Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    108
    Likes Received:
    960
    By coincidence I've been reading their 17-18 annual report today as well as their charity commission listing.

    They have appointed themselves arbiters of good science, citing success as being where what they consider a 'poor' paper/scientific endeavour appears in the media; front page vs page 8 or ideally not at all. What gives them the right to decide what is poor and what attention it gets?

    Also the declaration of interests of trustees/directors is interesting, I wonder if Simon Wessely's relationship with Ioppn, (which is his official address listed on the Companies House trustees/directors page) is listed on the briefing document.

    And I am also a bit fascinated by the number of 'experts' who SMC state volunteer their time sometimes at very short notice and out of hours. There's got to be some quid pro quo to it surely, (I don't mean monetary), unless it's just the chance of getting your name in the paper. ;)

    It does seem a lot of journalists know about the history of Fiona Fox because a few names have cropped up in old articles critical of her, like Ian Sample from the Guardian but presumably they are OK with using SMC because it makes life much easier for them. Although the Guardian is certainly not pro-fracking so they must resist SMC coverage of that whilst embracing the M.E. stance wholeheartedly.

    Sorry this has gone on a bit.
     

Share This Page