Online Program for School Nurses - Learn how ME/CFS keeps youth from attending school

R

RoseE

Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Has anyone done /reviewed the online program from the Northeastern University School of Nursing?

Wondering if we can recommend it (in NZ). (and presuming it can be accessed outside the US)

Title:
Online Program
Why Can't This Child Get to Class? Learn how ME/CFS keeps youth from attending school
*Myalgic Encephalomyelitis / Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Presenters:
  • Dr. Peter C. Rowe, Pediatrician, Director, Children's Center Chronic Fatigue Clinic at John Hopkins, and Professor of Pediatrics,
  • Lisa Hall, RN. Northampton Integrative Medicine, senior Nurse
  • Amy Mooney, MS, OTR/L, Occupational Therapist, parent of child with ME/CFS
  • Katherine Detwiler, parent of child with ME/CFS
Content:
Dr Rowe and Ms Hall "discuss an illness and disability that keeps afflicted children from attending school for months or even years at a time: ME/CFS (Myalgic Encephalomyelitis / Chronic Fatigue Syndrome), a disease the Centers for Disease Control calls America's hidden health crisis."

Objectives:
As a result of this online program, school nurses will be able to:
  1. State the estimated prevalence of ME/CFS in youth
  2. Describe the illness and treatment options
  3. Describe the patient and family experience: impact of ME/CFS on education and quality of life for youth; families’ experiences of ME/CFS in schools and connections with providers.
  4. Describe the role of the School Nurse with students suspected to have ME/CFS and resources/referral options
Contact Hours: 3.25
Cost: US$25

Provided by:
This program is provided by Northeastern University School Health Academy, which operates within Northeastern University School of Nursing, an ANCC-Accredited Provider, in collaboration with joint provider, Massachusetts ME/CFS & FM Association.

Link:
https://neusha.org/visit-neusha/index.php/online-course-overview/?exam_id=1409
 
I've just done this course. It's straightforward to purchase and complete it from overseas.

There are 4 videos, one by Dr Peter Rowe, one by a nurse and two by mothers of people with ME who became ill while children.

It has good points and bad ones.

The good ones include:
  • the two videos with the mothers. They both come across very well and help people who don't know about ME/CFS understand the realities of the illness. In one case, the child is severely affected. In the other, the child has now grown into an adult and had varying levels of functionality while young. Both mothers commented on how useful social media is these days; one mother mentioned how amazing it was that there were 5 mothers of children with PwME from New Zealand :) who understood her situation; the other told us how important online connections are for her son.
  • the video with the nurse is well focussed.
  • the course gets across that this is a significant illness. Rowe says 'these are some of the sickest patients I've seen in my career'.
  • it's also clear that this is an illness that hasn't been researched well enough, that there needs to be more funding.
  • there's some good links and some materials that might be a useful start when preparing your own materials - a practical assessment tool, sample physician letter, list of school accommodations.
  • the concept of PEM is covered
  • the point that these children are not school avoiders or just unfit is made clearly. Rowe specifically states that it's not school refusal, not factitious illness, not primary depression, not psychosomatic.
  • Rowe doesn't support curative CBT and slams the Lightning process as brainwashing and pseudoscience.
  • the nurse and the mothers note that there should be less stress about academic achievement e.g. allow the student to just attend school for lunch times if that is all they can do; try to leave energy for joyful activity
The bad ones include:
  • Dr Rowe's video is too long (over an hour)
  • Rowe gives detail that isn't necessary, for example going into the differences between the Fukuda criteria and the IOM criteria. With a target audience of school nurses, they just need to know what symptoms to look for.
  • Rowe spends a lot (really a lot) of time on EDS and joint hypermobility. There are pictures of finger splints, wrist braces, the Beighton test, he says that 60% of his patients have joint hypermobility. Obviously this is a big research interest of his, but the result is, I think, that many nurses listening to this will come away with a confused idea of what ME is.
  • Rowe gives a muddled view about exercise. He says that 'rigid advancement of graded exercise before the patients are necessarily ready' can cause harm. He later says 'we are big fans of manual physical therapy where we address the restrictions of movement and then gradually, flexibly increase their activity so they get back towards normal'. and he says 'for the really impaired patients, they've really got to start activity slowly, increasing very gradually as their symptoms allow'. In contrast, the nurse talks about how the prevailing culture of 'pushing through' doesn't work with ME.
  • Rowe says 'where possible, avoid excessive bedrest/sleeping', which I think does not acknowledge the reality of periods of hypersomnia, where parents trying to do the right thing end up pushing against the immoveable object of their child's need for sleep.
  • Rowe's categorisation of patients according to severity level seems off - accommodations he suggests for 'moderate to severe' children include an extra set of books, so books don't have to be carried to and from school; and a skipped day of school mid week.
In summary - if I had to choose between a nurse who had never heard of ME/CFS and one who had only done this course, definitely I'd be happy for them to have done the course. But I think it could be quite a lot better. I think if someone already knows a bit about ME/CFS, I'd rather they read the Paediatric Primer and spent some time talking to children with ME/CFS and their parents.

I think a problem is that so many 'ME/CFS experts' have their own unique spin on things. Perhaps rather than have a video of a doctor giving a long talk, it would be better to make a set of slides that say exactly what needs to be said.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom