This is just nonsense, one cant comment in the media or on social media about the issues under review but they can make a living out of the issues under review, obtain study grants to promote the current guidelines and continue to sell books that support the narrative of the things under review. So the whole of the BPS crowd on the panel can continue to work in their clinics making claims about the treatments but the medical advisor of a patient organisation would just have to shut up if more dubious papers where published during the review period and not critique them. He would also not be able to point out the objective weaknesses of the current treatments to patients. So will the BPsers on the committee be silent until 2022, give no presentations, interviews or take part in any studies on GET or CBT. Or do they just get to do what they want?