Utsikt
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
That’s even more depressing coming from a researcher!depressingly, me too.
That’s even more depressing coming from a researcher!depressingly, me too.
This part is not unique to ME/CFS though. Do a quick google search for Alzheimer’s or MS and there are dozens of non-bogus, but likely overhyped articles on treatments, biomarkers, preventative steps to take, etc. (This week Alzheimer’s seems to be caused by low lithium levels, etc).I’m so tired of every month a new biomarker or definitive cause being “announced” then looking into the data for it to be non impactful.
I don’t even know what to say we’re now taking a 5 minute video of an unsubstantiated claim running it through LLMs and reporting it as news .Cort Johnson article
![]()
Jarred Younger Finds a VERY Inflamed Brain in ME/CFS - Health Rising
“We’re seeing things in the front of the brain, we’re seeing issues in the back of the brain, we’re seeing a lot of things in between…this is a brain-wide issue”. It’s safe to say that the ME/CFS brain is an inflamed brain.” Jarred Younger Jarred Younger couldn’t resist. He’s usually […]www.healthrising.org
Yeah some of Cort’s reporting strikes me a bit like, “What if every biological claim a researcher made about ME was true at once”I don’t even know what to say we’re now taking a 5 minute video of an unsubstantiated claim running it through LLMs and reporting it as news .
It’s like a game of telephone….
The thing is though Jared presents himself as a beacon of truth for ME/CFS. He constantly breaks down other studies for scientific rigour, i.e. he ripped apart the rapamycin study. It’s a bit different than a tabloid presenting “the cure to Alzheimer’s”.This part is not unique to ME/CFS though. Do a quick google search for Alzheimer’s or MS and there are dozens of non-bogus, but likely overhyped articles on treatments, biomarkers, preventative steps to take, etc. (This week Alzheimer’s seems to be caused by low lithium levels, etc).
Cort argues that they’ll share anything that might help anyone, but apparently believe that everything can be helpful, so anything goes. It becomes a very nice platform for less rigorous researchers and practitioners, and the positive spins on everything can be temporarily uplifting for some readers.Yeah some of Cort’s reporting strikes me a bit like, “What if every biological claim a researcher made about ME was true at once”
Also potentially harmful when the claims make it into advocacy, and people start trialing whatever drugs he promotes this week.Cort argues that they’ll share anything that might help anyone, but apparently believe that everything can be helpful, so anything goes. It becomes a very nice platform for less rigorous researchers and practitioners, and the positive spins on everything can be temporarily uplifting for some readers.
I remember his blog was posted in my group a few times, recommended as "the best source about ME/CFS you can find". Not very recently though. I wish S4ME had the same appeal to people. It would make my job a lot easier in my group if there were some more well-informed, science-oriented people, because explaining things and arguing alone all the time about overstated claims really kills my energy.Also potentially harmful when the claims make it into advocacy, and people start trialing whatever drugs he promotes this week.
I remember I stopped reading him when he was promoting a study that said coffee reduces fatigue. Seemed off mark and a bit tone deaf to severity.
I feel you. I’ve given up on discussing research anywhere else for those reasons..I remember his blog was posted in my group a few times, recommended as "the best source about ME/CFS you can find". Not very recently though. I wish S4ME had the same appeal to people. It would make my job a lot easier in my group if there were some more well-informed, science-oriented people, because explaining things and arguing alone all the time about overstated claims really kills my energy.
I don’t think that feeling is necessarily equivalent to literal inflammation, ie. blood vessels dilating.Etc etc. Think it's beyond doubt there is brain inflammation since patients all complain of the horrible inflammed head feeling.
That's true.I don’t think that feeling is necessarily equivalent to literal inflammation, ie. blood vessels dilating.
In fact our evidence for inflammation as traditionally defined in the brain of pwME is very low.
I think most doctors globally will agree that there is no evidence for inflammation in ME/CFS and extremely sensible arguments have put forward why that is the case, see for instanceEtc etc. Think it's beyond doubt there is brain inflammation since patients all complain of the horrible inflammed head feeling, it's basically my worst symptom. Feels like there's something in my head and the horrible pressure.
This comes up a lot, may I ask for the basis of this statement?
hahahha I like that theory just because I can imagine it well.and producing toxic ammonia that causes the brain symptoms.
That's good, as it ties in with how the (auto) antibodies restrict blood flow at least.I think most doctors globally will agree that there is no evidence for inflammation in ME/CFS and extremely sensible arguments have put forward why that is the case, see for instance
This comes up a lot, may I ask for the basis of this statement?
It is very simple. inflammation is a physiological change based on local blood vessel function that involves a change in calibre, permeability to water and solutes and cell diapedesis. It has been known since Roman times through the signs of: dolor, calor, rubor, tumor (and loss of function). In ME/CFS we can see from looking at the body and, most precisely, analysing tissue fluid content with MRI, that this occurs nowhere.
There is no inflammation.
As pointed out in our paper, there may be production of some...
Just that the evidence very consistently suggests that there aren't any specific elevated antibodies in ME/CFS.That's good, as it ties in with how the (auto) antibodies restrict blood flow at least.