This is the problem pacing up rather than pacing yourself
I am wondering who R and K ME Group is?
Also from their home page:ABOUT US
Richmond and Kingston ME Group, are a support group for people with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME), also know as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS), and our mission is to provide support to anyone affected by ME/CFS.
Our purpose is to reduce isolation, provide support and information to our members, reach new members, raise public awareness of ME/CFS and its devastating effect on people and their families.
We provide training sessions locally for medical, education, social and other welfare support services to increase understanding of ME/CFS.
We are also involved in campaigning for better local and domiciliary services for people with this condition and in supporting biomedical research into ME/CFS.
The most important aspect of treatment is activity management — which involves striking the right balance between activity and rest so as not to exacerbate symptoms. This is known as pacing.
Our understanding is that GAM is finding a baseline of activities that doesn't make our symptoms worse and then gradually increase it. In other words, it's pacing instead of GET. However, let's wait for the publication of the new Guidelines to confirm this.
That isn't pacing as I understand it. My understanding is that there should be no deliberate increasing of activity unless the person is well enough for it to be within their baseline. In other words the above makes no sense. GAM is GET.
This GAM is exactly GET. When I was instructed in GET at an NHS ME/CFS centre, I was told to first establish such a baseline and then grade up.
Activity management sounds like handling kindergartners. It's like they can't help themselves being condescending, even when they have to do pacing, they will give it the most possibly insulting name as if we're just a bunch of toddlers who need our activities managed. And of course it's the graded part that is explicitly wrong so the fact that it's the only part they kept is amazingly incompetent.They've just changed the name to GAM (graded activity management). What they were calling GET sometimes turned out to be more like APT (adaptive pacing therapy as per PACE). But none of them are 'pacing'.
The key thing to spot is when if they talk about 'boom and bust'.
"boom and bust" is what they (PACE trial authors and subsequent 'followers' of the deconditioning fear/avoidance theory) used in the original description of how CFS(ME) is supposedly perpetuated.Wait I thought boom and bust was the same as push crash, with the idea that you don't push so you are less likely to crash, is it not that?
https://www.reed.co.uk/jobs/band-6-...s&filter=/jobs/health-jobs?sortby=DisplayDateJob Summary:
This is new clinic (Long Covid) which sits and works alongside the well-established chronic fatigue syndrome / Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME). Monies will be temporary which is likely to be March 2022.
Ideally we are looking for Occupational Therapists who have experience in Biopsychosocial work / Open Systems Models e.g. Assessment and Management of CFS/ME - FND - Pain Management, Neurosciences ; Mental Health.
I'm not certain it's exactly the same across the country but in most areas the long covid "clinic" is an assessment/triage pitstop type service, patients then get referred to IAPT, the ME service, or other secondary care services when they can deal with specific symptoms and do specific tests. In most areas areas ME services have had extra funding to run separate long covid groups *for those who meet the criteria for ME*.does anyone know how many of the LC clinics are also ME/CFS clinics
... what we need to concentrate on now post publication...[...]...
3. Commission new better services
4. Audit current services to see if compliant to the new guideline
5. Join Commissioning groups and Patient groups to try and influence
...
...This complexity means that dealing with how the existing/future clinics operate needs to be a co-operative process across the UK, and needs to be set in the context of how 100% of PwME access services...
He doesn't run a centre. There are NO doctors at any ME/CFS centres anywhere in Cumbria, that's been the case for at least 8 years, since the North Cumbria and Northumberland Trust merger was called out... a once a month BPS doctor from Newcastle area did diagnosis only. (And botched mine by inventing a term not in SNOWMED).
Reporting for speaking as if on behalf of a clinic he does not represent in a field he does not work in is essential. Also undermining those who do work there.
Dr Alastair Miller, things to know for anyone being interviewed or engaging with media
BBC, Guardian (links previously posted on this thread) and others describe him as:
an NHS consultant physician in acute medicine and infectious disease in North Cumbria, said exercise programmes could be helpful
Reality: Yes technically his role but entirely unrelated to ME/CFS treatment in North Cumbria or anything else.
Reality: These interviews are misleading because the public will assume there actually ARE doctors treating ME/CFS across the UK - this is not true in North Cumbria, South Cumbria or many other areas.
His context-less quotes are misleading because
So tired of hearing a doctor NOT impacted quoted and of the misleading impression that there are actually doctors involved when there aren't.
- He doesn't work in or have any role in ME/CFS any more and has not for I believe around a decade
- North Cumbria does not have ANY infectious disease specialists in their "specialist ME/CFS service"
- North Cumbria does not have ANY doctors of ANY kind in their "specialist ME/CFS services"
- North Cumbria's ME/CFS service does not diagnose, it used to but they scrapped that, it does not offer any medical advice and does not advise on medication at all (links below)
- South Cumbria does not either have any ME/CFS clinic doctors either, this is probably true of North Lancashire too
- North Cumbria's old ME/CFS and fibromyalgia clinic morphed into a general service a little over 10 years ago, which was then renamed Persistent Physical Symptoms, all treatment was refused unless you agreed to a psych session on the 3Ps
- Persistent Physical Symptoms is now part of the Physical Health Psychology unit, but it is not the part that deals with MS, stroke, or well understood diagnoses
- It is held at community (cottage) hospitals, at least one of which is in the only non-wheelchair accessible part of the hospital - and upstairs.
- Diane L Cox of PACE trial is in this area, and in-patient "rehab" is the North Yorkshire / Leeds BPS hospital unit which published a paper on their "successes" which involved a lot of removing diagnoses. I believe she's an Occupational Therapist. Severe and very severe patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: perceived outcome following an inpatient programme (2000)
I would really like to see Dr Miller challenged on his role within the ME/CFS clinincs at present (he doesn't have one) and asked how many doctors are in his NHS trust for ME/CFS (none). Number of home visits is also zero unless something has dramatically changed.
https://php.cumbria.nhs.uk/
https://php.cumbria.nhs.uk/about-our-services/ppss
https://php.cumbria.nhs.uk/about-ou...lth-and-rehabilitation-psychology/cfs-service
I am unsure how it is ever possible to get media corrections or clarifications when such misleading content is published. I feel the public would feel very differently if they were aware that doctors were not part of these clinics.
They have belittled and made the link child like and don't mention well anything medical it is all given headings of well look https://me.ecch.org/rough-guide-to-me-cfs/
Do you know where this is from @Suffolkres ?
I agree that there are problems with information like this.
Maybe now is the time to try to bring some sense into information for ME.
They don't diagnose - only doctors diagnose - but this is not an isolated case either.That made me AngreMad. It is the case all over the UK that they just diagnose and then you self manage. Has anyone looked at this? I normally support families where I have to fight off intervention of the very nasty kind. I am now looking at transition as my son is now going over to Adult services and well now reading my areas new and most wonderful (not) website no mention of PEM POTS or OI. Now making notes which I will send but they wont change or care because there is no need who is going to make them?
I can tweet the information if that will help? embarrass the BBC and journalists. I'm just about to do that with the services in my area as it is a joke. They have belittled and made the link child like and don't mention well anything medical it is all given headings of well look https://me.ecch.org/rough-guide-to-me-cfs/
This really is a time for co-ordinated action, at the very least many hundreds of letters need to be written, and ideally those letters need to reflect 'local stakeholding' (yes I know "yuk", but we need think in terms of bureaucratic audience we have to address). Even in NI, Scotland and Wales where commissioning is notionally at least, done at devolved Government level, local providers/potential providers need to be contacted to alert them to local concern/service demand. In England as a you say 'localism' rules with apprx 250 CCGs to be engaged with.How can we ensure we are involved in and heard in the changes that are going to come? Does anybody have any specifics on what the charities are going to do to influence service redesign?
The NHS restructure is making everything more local and place based, after the NHS national guidelines are set, new services and redesigns will be done at CCG level and at least in token form they will involve patients and the public in that process. How exactly can we make sure we are at the table and how do the charities contribute?
I can't even begin thinking about how quality and compliance will be ensured.