Barry
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Although there is some validity to that, I should have thought the changes could have been normalised to a fair degree, given that employment market changes would be pretty well understood.I seem to recall that when this was raised the PACE trial authors claimed this wasn't an objective measure because of possible changes in the employment market.
To me if I'm recovered, I'm able to come off benefits, work full time, do my house work and have a life.
But when I said this he [PDW] asked me: "Do you want to go back to the life that gave you ME?"
That's a cop out.
It's way beyond a cop-out. It's a blatant admission of the presumption that a person's lifestyle and attitude to their life is the cause of their ME.
That, surely, is good anecdotal evidence of supportive care being withheld from a patient due to wilful misdiagnosis, and thereby risk of harm.He said,'Do you think it's down to you?' On my report he has written: "[name] is making good progress. [Name]'s only remaining barriers are [name]'s illness beliefs"
Last edited: