Our previous name was the International Alliance for ME. We decided to update this name, our logo and our branding to move our alliance forwards, and ensure we could build on our unique position and strengths. We still operate the same way, with member organisations from across the world.
I may be involved in quite a few things but not this one, sorry.This bit of the website is confusing:
"The World ME Alliance calls upon WHO and its Member States to:
from https://worldmealliance.org/what-we-do/
- Formally engage with the IAFME and its members at the national level in order to address ME patients’ barriers."
@Andy @Gecko
We are seeking a formal consultation channel with the WHO to represent the millions of people affected by ME and bring forth greater technical input into the design and delivery of health and other services to respond to their needs.
Was it a fixed term appointment / is funding her salary dependent on multiple inputs ?
there are several of them listed as 'founding member'; I took this to mean founding members of the original IAFME.
this one is quite apt tho:There are too many acronyms in this world
Hmmm... curious timing. Two days ago ads from local LP (and derivatives) sellers started swamping my FB feed. Coincidence?We “do not endorse the Lightning Process” say World ME Alliance members
The World ME Alliance and its members have worked closely over the past few months to reach a collective position on the Lightning Process.
The Lightning Process is a commercial training programme that is promoted by practitioners as a cure or treatment for ME without due evidence. Additionally, there are reports of people with ME experiencing a worsening of their symptoms and functioning after undertaking the programme.
Some member organisations are experiencing great difficulty with misinformation in their countries, and therefore asked the Alliance for support in reaching an evidence-based collective position.
https://worldmealliance.org/2022/08...htning-process-say-world-me-alliance-members/