1. Click here to sign the "Publish the NICE ME/CFS Guideline Now" petition.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 13th September 2021 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

What's in a name? Change to Ramsays?

Discussion in 'Advocacy Projects and Campaigns' started by Sly Saint, Jan 31, 2018.

  1. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,663
    Location:
    UK
    From me-pedia:
    "The advantages of using the term, "Ramsay's Disease," is that as science discovers more about the pathophysiology of the disease, the name would not have to change. Currently, the many changes in the name of the illness has interfered with an accurate literature search for research, as well as, the education of physicians and the public, and contributed to frustration in the patient community."
    "
    http://me-pedia.org/wiki/Ramsay's_Disease

    WHOs guidelines re NEW names.........not sure if it applies to changing existing ones, then there is also the 'infectious' issue.

    "Among the existing monikers that its new guidelines “for the Naming of New Human Infectious Diseases” would discourage: Ebola, swine flu, Rift Valley Fever, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, and monkey pox. Instead, WHO says researchers, health officials, and journalists should use more neutral, generic terms, such as severe respiratory disease or novel neurologic syndrome."

    http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/05/discovered-disease-who-has-new-rules-avoiding-offensive-names

    "“In recent years, several new human infectious diseases have emerged. The use of names such as ‘swine flu’ and ‘Middle East Respiratory Syndrome’ has had unintended negative impacts by stigmatizing certain communities or economic sectors,” says Dr Keiji Fukuda, Assistant Director-General for Health Security, WHO. "
    http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/notes/2015/naming-new-diseases/en/

    on a side note but of importance is the psychosocial crew are already 'renaming/redefining'
    see https://dxrevisionwatch.com/category/bodily-distress-syndrome-2/
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5032513/
     
    Last edited: Jan 31, 2018
  2. Valentijn

    Valentijn Guest

    Messages:
    2,275
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Someone should tell ME-pedia that international conventions now oppose naming diseases after people. I don't see the point in debating the advantages and disadvantages of something that literally is never going to happen.
     
  3. Alvin

    Alvin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,309
    But i was so looking forward to my Ford Nucleon :cry:
     
  4. erin

    erin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    550
    Gosh, first to come to my mind was Gordon Ramsay!:facepalm:
     
  5. Cinders66

    Cinders66 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,186
    SEID was only supposed to be a temporary name until we could label accurately based on evidence. Currently the states are left with CFS or CFS/ME. Much of Europe is left with CFS and uk CFS, MUS or FND. The issues with CFS was the fact it's vagueness was designed to leave it open to psychological explanations, it puts fatigue as focus and is exceedingly vulnerable to the reduced CF. Both in UK & USA we haven't succeeded in getting any form of ME accepted, nor in the uk is there a movement to get one. I personally think it was a missed opportunity not to ride on the wave of the IOM report and embrace the temporary Name SEID , which sounds more serious, physical and gets PEM as the focus. I was reading about Unusual mitochondrial myopathies and repeatedly the symptom of exercise intolerance, along with fatigue and pain was mention in the review paper , so I see nothing harmful in the EI part of the name. The fact it spells dies backwards is as irrelevant as AIDS spelling SDIA backwards.
     
  6. arewenearlythereyet

    arewenearlythereyet Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,092
    That would be a nightmare.
     
    Invisible Woman, erin and chrisb like this.
  7. wastwater

    wastwater Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    268
    What about B cell? T cell? NK cell? (BTNK)?
     
    Little Bluestem likes this.
  8. Mij

    Mij Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    5,059
    I don't swear or yell so I would be excluded from that diagnosis.
     
  9. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,086
    Yes I always thought the fact that SEID spelt dies backwards was completely irrelevant.

    I thought that ME/SEID to replace ME/CFS would be a way to go. We could see which would survive.
     
    MEMarge, WillowJ, ahimsa and 8 others like this.
  10. Seven

    Seven Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    186
    WHat I understand is that the use of scientist or person name for disease have been abandon, why they would not consider Ramsey as a name. I forgot why this is the case or where I read it becuase that was my preference back in the day too.
     
    WillowJ, adambeyoncelowe and ballard like this.
  11. Little Bluestem

    Little Bluestem Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,450
    OT, but does anyone know where the name Ebola came from?
     
    MEMarge and Invisible Woman like this.
  12. Mij

    Mij Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    5,059
  13. dannybex

    dannybex Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    119
    Seems to me the name used most frequently about 10-15 years ago in the USA was CFIDS (for Chronic Fatigue and Immune Dysfunction Syndrome). I always thought they could take the 'F', and then we'd have Chronic Immune Dysfunction Syndrome, which IMO wouldn't be too bad. Or at least not nearly as bad...
     
  14. Mij

    Mij Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    5,059
    Thames Disease . . . named after the Royal Free hospital outbreak

    Named after a river in London.
     
    MyalgicE, MEMarge, erin and 1 other person like this.
  15. Liv aka Mrs Sowester

    Liv aka Mrs Sowester Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,201
    I expect that when we finally find out what is driving our illness a suitable name will present itself.
    In the meantime it's just a minefield - in fact this is the first discussion of the name I've seen that hasn't turned into an argument! Names are hard.
     
  16. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,663
    Location:
    UK
    I have been doing a lot of reading on this and the conclusion I have come to is largely one of representation/association. By that I mean that initially M.E. (or CFIDS in the US) were associated with biological origin/ physical disease not just by patients but by researchers at the time.

    CFS was then introduced and associated with the psychosocial/psychological origins ,psychs,insurance companies etc. This has continued, but even some of the most devoted researchers of M.E. had problems with the name and suggested tweaking it (eg encephalopathy) or created their own subtypes, and then those who prefered the CFS moniker started doing the same to fit with their own interpretations.

    But for at least the last 10/15 years people have been being diagnosed with CFS, as M.E (and CFIDS) were rarely used for diagnosis. Most of these patients accepted the name without any knowledge of the 'conflict'.

    Although the 'conflict' still continues even those who are considered staunch believers in one name over the other have conceded.
    "
    At The Nightingale Research Foundation in Ottawa, Canada, we have stuck with the name Myalgic Encephalomyelitis because there have been at least 10 names used in the literature since we started looking at this disease process in 1984 and we are simply tired of trying to keep up with the name changes. We have also tried to avoid the term "fatigue". Fatigue is immeasurable and largely indefinable."

    It is interesting that over the last few years M.E. as a name is seeing a bit of a resurgence as the 'BPS takeover' becomes more widely exposed, largely IMO down to this issue of association (as well as dislike for the name CFS for obvious reasons).

    Contrary to what people have posted above, the WHOs guidelines are just that, and not enforceable:

    "Of course, since they are just best practices, there's no guarantee anyone will adhere strictly to these new guidelines. For Ian Lipkin, an epidemiologist at Columbia University, new disease names need to be first and foremost informative."

    "The International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses has final say when classifying a new disease, but often a colloquial name spreads so quickly, the committee is left with few choices, which is what happened with swine flu."

    https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/qkvamm/how-to-name-a-disease
     
    Last edited: May 24, 2018
  17. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,663
    Location:
    UK
  18. chrisb

    chrisb Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,874
    That tweet by Colby is good evidence for the proposition that complex matters cannot usefully be considered on twitter.

    The name should be used how? According to the original criteria? As a synonym for CFS under one of its sets of criteria, and if so which?
    What is to become of those with a current diagnosis excluded by the new name?

    It would add a whole new layer of confusion if Ramsay's disease were not synonymous with the Ramsay criteria for ME.
     
  19. Dx Revision Watch

    Dx Revision Watch Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,475
    I've been through this many times before on other platforms:


    WHO/ICD-11 position on use of eponyms:


    ICD-11 Content Model Reference Guide:

    http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/revision/Content_Model_Reference_Guide.January_2011.pdf

    (...)

    Page 59

    "Use of Name of Noun formed after a person (eponyms)

    The naming of diseases after proper nouns or people (e.g. eponyms) are explicitly discouraged, except in historical cases where the eponym is already well-established (Alzheimer, Parkinson, etc.). However, eponyms can be entered into the tool as synonyms. Eponyms are used without the Genitive “’s”.

    Use of acronyms

    An acronym is an abbreviation formed from the first letters of other words and pronounced as a word (e.g. NASA). Acronyms may never be used for titles of categories. They should be added as synonyms to the appropriate spelt out disease entity thus facilitating identification of the relevant cases and categories."
     
  20. Dx Revision Watch

    Dx Revision Watch Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,475
    Last edited: Apr 26, 2019

Share This Page