I think
@MeSci tried writing to her once before and got a brush off.
Edit - which isn't to say it isn't worth writing another.
This is what I wrote:
"Dear Caroline,
I have been a member of the Green Party for a long time - since before I got ME and my two degrees in biological science (the Masters degree was a distinction, obtained before my recent worsening).
I have just been shocked to find that you are a patron of the Sussex & Kent ME/CFS Society.
Please look on the other ME sites, for example the recently set-up site
https://www.s4me.info/ (Science for ME), Phoenix Rising and several other sites about ME, and you will hopefully realise that the Sussex & Kent ME/CFS Society does not represent ME properly, and in fact misleads people very badly.
This is an illness which has been misrepresented and under-funded for decades, with the consequence that sufferers are doomed to a life of being disbelieved, mocked, underfunded, etc. Many of us were extremely able before the illness hit.
I am passionately Green, and used to be very active until the disease made it impossible. I therefore hope fervently that you will take this email seriously, and either make urgent enquiries of the Society of which you are a patron, or simply leave, perhaps instead joining one of the more correctly-run organisations.
There is at last a lot of movement within this illness, with America dropping references to the hugely-damaging GET (graded exercise therapy) and the ill-placed CBT (cognitive behavioural therapy), and the UK at last listening to patients and reviewing their guidance properly. (It will take a couple of years.) I would like to see the Green Party at the forefront of this revolution.
Thank you for your time and attention to this important matter.
Yours sincerely"
ref
https://www.s4me.info/threads/more-from-sussex-kent-me-cfs-society-date-unknown.1906/#post-33304
I posted her reply on the same thread,
and then I wrote:
"Dear Caroline,
Sorry for the delay, but my brain hasn't been working very well!
The first article is quite good, but the rituximab study sadly didn't succeed. It may be promising for a minority of patients (maybe 30%).
I'm glad that you signed EDM 271.
I'm aware of the review of the NICE Guidance, and am pleased that you are keeping an eye on it. So am I, but we need to be very vigilant. We thought that the last review would produce valid results, but sadly it didn't.
My criticism of the Sussex & Kent ME/CFS Society is based among other things on the influence of advisors such as Professor Esther Crawley (info about her can be found in numerous places) and Dr Alastair Miller (See for example
https://www.s4me.info/threads/not-a-recommendation-alastair-miller-on-cfs.1685/).
NB Jonathan Edwards, who says "Competent researchers in ME/CFS have no problem at all with patient 'activists', who value good quality research. It is not in fact that well meaning and dedicated researchers have problems with 'activists' but rather that self-promoting researchers have a problem with patients and academics such as myself calling them out for shoddy work" is a highly-qualified retired doctor and academic.
Dr Neil Harrison appears to be OK:
https://www.s4me.info/threads/cmrc-...-the-board-of-the-cmrc.2809/page-8#post-50903
See also
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/l...chronic-fatigue-illness-disease-a8133616.html
I hope this is clear - please let me know if anything needs clarifying. I can't promise to reply quickly - ME has taken its toll on my brain after 23 years. It may be mendable!
Yours sincerely,"
The quotes are both from this site. Sorry I can't engage more at present. The messages are all in the same thread, I think.