Agree 100%It's good that they are challenging this research, but I don't think there's any research evidence to support this:
I know the NICE guideline says it can be offered, but I don't think it should be repeated without the warning that it can also cause harm, as it did to me.
it’s time people are brave enough to say it doesn’t work without feeling they have to add another lie as a fop. Which is then used to offer something which is harmful when it’s the last thing someone needs as ‘the only treatment’ for something most don’t have instead of focusing on what support ie basic measures and monitoring and help with adjustments CAN make a difference
good monitoring and adjustments and help with forms, and confirming our requests for certain processes to adapt to the needs of those need to access them are needed by all
instead because people are afraid of darvo from the anti-psychology, anti-mental health and health bunch who want to treat disabled people as hysterical women who need educating how to get themselves together and act better we end up with this nonsense (and pretend that is 'mental health' instead of an attack on mental health and a weaponising of the label) - leaving in staff and in charge the very bigots who think this is ‘help’ and certainly didn’t sign up to a job being gently listening and supportive but to motivate out of their bad negative thinking in heir mind. These people won’t be told because they don’t want that job. And even if they are they won’t do it and will rail against it
why are they being proppped up like this?
Last edited: