Liessa
Established Member (Voting Rights)
I presume on the previous committee 10+ years ago, and in the NICE sub-groups assessing things in between, there were no people really in a position to argue forcefully against the serious flaws of these studies. That is not the case this time around. Also, I think the reputation of PACE and this research will continue to fall as the NICE committee meets over the next year or so.
That seems to have happened in The Netherlands with the Gezondheidsraad committee. There was a lot of outrage at the BPS-heavy selection of committee members (most notably dr. Knoop, who made the "strict criterion of recovery" comment on PACE
Recently the Dutch health minister responded to these conclusions thread here. Took quite a while (the Gezondheidsraad Report is from 19 march 2018) but with the government adopting these recommendations we're making some headway.
I should add that this is not replacing guidelines as of yet, but the Dutch association for GPs removed them from their website in october. Babysteps..