A NZer has reached out for advice on challenging their Insurance company's request that they use GET and CBT for a period.
Are there any threads here in s4me of how people have challenged that?
What evidence /research would this forum recommend is provided to argue that these treatments are not appropriate for people with ME/CFS ?
This thread has a number of useful publications listed:
https://www.s4me.info/threads/articles-that-are-critical-of-cbt-get.63/
This thread discusses the evidence:
https://www.s4me.info/threads/if-i-...ho-and-which-would-you-use.12852/#post-226037
and suggests the IOM (although now becoming a bit old); the CDC website (great in parts, but some comments a bit ambiguous if trying to refute CBT and GET); and the New York State Department of Health website.
Also http://workwellfoundation.org/wp-co...T-Letter-to-Health-Care-Providers-v4-30-2.pdf
The NZ Canterbury HealthPathway might be useful, given it is a recent update of treatment advice to NZ doctors. And of course the letter to the NZ GP (News from New Zealand and the Pacific Islands), the Emerge website and the ThinkGP CME, all of which you are aware of.
I'm happy to try to help the person if they want to get in touch.
Edited to add some links.
Last edited: