Me inbetween every paragraph
![]()
In fact, CFS is a rare outcome of consultations. "Rare" and "common" are
defined here pragmatically from the working viewpoint of primary care. This definition may be
differentiate from the official definition of "rare" or "not uncommon" diseases - formulation
has not changed.
See remarks above, points 1 and 2, wording remains unchanged.
See General Reservations above, in particular point 2, wording slightly modified accordingly
These considerations constitute an arbitrary compilation of personal opinions and opinions.
and statements and laboratory findings of questionable relevance. No consequences for the formulations
of the guideline.
Some of the proposals have already been included in the guideline (recognition of suffering, individualised treatment and treatment of the patients), procedure, taking into account the needs and abilities of the patient), in some cases we hold the following points for inappropriate (role of "pathophysiology"). Formulations unchanged.
I hope that the next few years will shed even better light on CFS, many studies are conducted. I see a lot of things like you, too. In my opinion, the prevalence is too high with 250,000-300,000 sufferers in Germany. You can't use the prevalence numbers of America, especially since there have also been epidemics in America, which hasn't happenend here in Germany. That would make CFS a contagious disease, but I can't confirm that.
There is a Dutch study which shows that hunger in the war years 1944-45 at
of a pregnant woman affected the genome of the unborn child. demonstrably
the IGF2 gene produced long-term DNA methylation in the IGF2 gene while it was still present in the human genome
in the case of the siblings born later, with a change in methylation
in the IGF2 gene. http://www.pnas.org/content/105/44/17046.full
Further studies are also interesting, which show that early childhood trauma or stress in the
Pregnancy and environmental pollution change the genes through methylation, in part by
until further generations hiNo. http://www.pharmazeutische-zeitung.de/index.php?id=6438
This is also known in tobacco smoking pregnant women. The fabrics in the cigarette can take the placental barrier
and change the DNA sustainably. https://www.aerzteblatt.de/nachrich...er-Schwangerschaft-kann-fetale-DNA-veraendern
(Without any source or further info.)In our association there are many doctors, including human geneticists and molecular biologists. These
conduct and have published their own studies.
I also agree with you that deconditioning is not the right way forward. Permanent
bedriddenness ultimately leads to an overall deterioration of the condition and not improvement.
For this reason, the CFS patient should be activated according to his or her individuell strength/energy under medical/therapeutic supervision.
Apparantly this is supposed to drescribe the other two organizations and the majority of pwME? Funnily enough she's the only one to make it personal.Thank you very much for not putting us in the same pot as many others from the CFS scene. We
would like to discuss on the factual and content level and not on a personal level with self-knitted attitudes and perception.
Incidentally, I was also born in July (6.7.1958), I read in my CV that you were born on July 20,1951. Certainly this means we have many things in common, including the notion of decency and respect.
The following quotations are from a letter from the head of the Fatigatio to the guideline committee. It's published in the "guideline report".
The Fatigatio is the oldest German organization (since 1993) and much bigger than the others (1600 members). They have let sufferers down a lot in the past and are kind of the German Action for ME (but in an unprofessional way). Unfortunately they're located in Berlin what makes them look kind of important. I'm still a member, because it seemed like the natural choice when I was diagnosed and knew nothing and lived in Berlin, but after gems from them like Gupta, childhood trauma, openly smearing other organizations, recommending in the last media report to stop being perfectionist and just stop ironing and then you should be ok, censoring their forums, going behind the other organization's back in the last guideline process seven years ago - this letter to the guideline committee was what they could muster in defence of ME patients:
No talk of relevant studies or international guidelines, instead this strange collection of how smoking and childhood trauma affects the genes in generations to come:
(Without any source or further info.)
Apparantly this is supposed to subscribe the other two organizations and the majority of pwME? Funnily enough she's the only one to make it personal.
http://www.degam.de/files/Inhalte/Leitlinien-Inhalte/Dokumente/DEGAM-S3-Leitlinien/053-002 Leitlinie Muedigkeit/Methodenreport/053-002_Methodenreport_30.01.18.pdf
p. 94, p. 95
To paraphrase: "Dozens, if not hundreds, of scientists disagree with everything me and my two buddies have said. But they are definitely wrong, because me and my buddies are very SMRT."This is what they have to say to IOM, NIH, CDC, BMJ etc.:
I would have thought the widespread starvation in the Netherlands near the end of the war would have been more relevant than stress. Reckon they controlled for that?No talk of relevant studies or international guidelines, instead this strange collection of how smoking and childhood trauma affects the genes in generations to come:
Yup, that's definitely the arbiters of science, logic, and reason right thereIncidentally, I was also born in July (6.7.1958), I read in my CV that you were born on July 20,1951. Certainly this means we have many things in common, including the notion of decency and respect.
Strangely the letters and interventions from the Lost Voices Stiftung are missing from the "Methodenreport" document. I asked the German Association and they said they have no idea why and that the Lost Voices Stiftung did amazing work and was able to get some sentences slightly changed.I hope more will follow and leave fatigatio, and give their money, voice and energy to other organizations who have proved to advocate for people with ME.
Thank you for offering to participate in the Delphi process, but my request
was only the participation in the chapter CFS. Here I have seen that unfortunately only a small part
of my suggestions was taken into account.
It's so sad. I posted in the only German forum about the guideline yesterday and not a single answer so far. People should be enraged but they don't care. We don't have a patient movement/opposition in Germany. I think the first step is that we need more diagnosed people (my guess is that far less than the internationally estimated 10% are diagnosed here). I would have loved to to advocacy work earlier (and outside my bed) if I had known my diagnosis.
I totally agree but I think you mean the Swiss forums (symptome.ch) and I meant the German forums (cfs-treffpunkt). But it's the same in both forums. No mention of the new guideline in the Fatigatio forums by the way (members only).I know that forum, too, as you knowI invest my energy here, it's a much nicer place. I am not surprised though. There once was a time when a hot discussion would have started, see an older thread about the previos guideline. But today, there's a certain agenda/ideology (alternative treatments, psychology); I am always sad for new people that come and who seek for help and get "eat healthily, do psychotherapy, do sports" as advice.
Ah, yes, the swiss one is more hostile. The German one...well...doesn't surprise me at all. No action there, people seem to be happy with how it is.I totally agree but I think you mean the Swiss forums (symptome.ch) and I meant the German forums (cfs-treffpunkt). But it's the same in both forums. No mention of the new guideline in the Fatigatio forums by the way (members only).
What????Joh said:ETA: In the meantime people answered in the German forums and think it's positive that bedridden patients should be activated and that the guideline is ok.![]()
I know it sounds stupid because I volunteer for the German Association and like an advertisement. But it's rather the other way around and I chose them because I value their evidence-based scientific approach.
I would recommend to check out the letters from the German Association to DEGAM in the guideline report from page 74-90. I think they did amazing work. One of the two people who did the guideline work is healthy (with a family member with ME) and did all the work as a volunteer parallel to a full time job:
http://www.degam.de/files/Inhalte/Leitlinien-Inhalte/Dokumente/DEGAM-S3-Leitlinien/053-002 Leitlinie Muedigkeit/Methodenreport/053-002_Methodenreport_30.01.18.pdf
My thoughts, @Philipp, as you might guessis there anything about this guideline that can be challenged legally under any law whatsoever? Do we have anything this document might fall under? Anything at all?