1. Sign our petition calling on Cochrane to withdraw their review of Exercise Therapy for CFS here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 18th March 2024 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

Long Covid epidemiology (prevalence, incidence, recovery rates)

Discussion in 'Long Covid news' started by ME/CFS Skeptic, Feb 20, 2021.

  1. ME/CFS Skeptic

    ME/CFS Skeptic Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,495
    Location:
    Belgium
    moved thread
    Ok, but most of these studies are based on confirmed PCR tests which if I understand correctly require virus particles, not necessarily antibodies.

    On Twitter someone pointed me to this Danish preprint which found that 16% of patients reported fatigue and 13% concentration difficulties 12 weeks after COVID-19 infection. Acute and persistent symptoms in non-hospitalized PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients (medrxiv.org)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 19, 2021
    Michelle, Kitty, alktipping and 3 others like this.
  2. rogerblack

    rogerblack Established Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    43
    The number of people in the UK with severe post-covid fatigue right now likely exceeds the generally accepted ~200K number for those with CFS. If they are in fact caused by the same pathology, 'our' numbers have just doubled.

    At 18 weeks after infection, 12% of the 15+M infected in the UK with covid were still suffering symptoms. This figure only dropped 2% from the 12th week. #mecfs #longcovid The evidence some may remain unwell longterm is clear. 200K have severe day-day difficulties.
    I think it's reasonable to say that at the very least those 200K would meet CFS criteria.

    https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopula...coronaviruscovid19infectionintheuk/1april2021

    [​IMG]
    The end of this curve is hideously flat.
     
  3. ME/CFS Skeptic

    ME/CFS Skeptic Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,495
    Location:
    Belgium
    I'm still waiting for the first study that appropriately selected COVID-patients and a control group, followed them up for a long enough time (6 months or longer) and that used a stringent threshold for disability (for example ME/CFS criteria), not just how many people report symptoms.

    CFS criteria such as Fukuda are pretty stringent - prevalence studies suggest that most people with unexplained fatigue symptoms do not meet them.
     
    ladycatlover, Hutan, Sarah94 and 15 others like this.
  4. Simon M

    Simon M Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    882
    Location:
    UK
    The ONS survey asked about impact on daily activities: no impact, limited a little or limited a lot.

    Only one in five of the 14% of people who had at least one symptom at 12 weeks (which gave the headline figure) said the daily activities were limited a lot.

    So, that works out at 3% of people with enduring symptoms that limits their daily activities a lot at 12 weeks. I think that works out in the tens of thousands. Still a lot.

    But the number will be lower at six months (as the curve shows). And a good chunk of those will have problems e.g. due to organ damage or post-intensive care issues.

    I still think this is the best data we have because it’s a fairly large And relatively representative survey.

    But we still have a long way to go before we know how many people in the UK have long Covid, let alone if/how many of those have ME/CFS.
     
    Last edited: Apr 6, 2021
  5. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,393
    I hadn't thought that through. That's actually quite a bit lower than would be expected for glandular fever.
     
  6. Peter Trewhitt

    Peter Trewhitt Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,637
    Interesting that previously there was the idea that other SARS virus related epidemics resulted in relatively high percentages of people developing ME, higher than you would expect from EBV infections.

    I forget my source, but using one set of figures relating to a previous SARS epidemic, a very very approximate ‘back of a fag packet’ calculation I did at the start of the year left me expecting a UK doubling in cases of ME about now. Though obviously not fun for those that do get persistent problems hopefully Covid-19 is resulting in fewer cases of ME than might have been expected. It is still early to draw firm conclusions about the actual figures, but given the sheer size of the pandemic globally this will still be a lot of people.

    Over the course of my ME I have been conscious that I have been very lucky to have been where and when I am. I suspect that had I not had safety nets that prevented homelessness or starvation, I would have died of an adventitious infection or other disease or in an accident relatively early in the course of my ME. How do we start planning for those with long Covid and related conditions in situations where there are few or no safety nets?
     
    ukxmrv, merylg, ladycatlover and 11 others like this.
  7. arewenearlythereyet

    arewenearlythereyet Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,092
    I thought the age prevalence was interesting but the gender split seems quite different to PWME when you look at the proportions?

     
  8. arewenearlythereyet

    arewenearlythereyet Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,092
    And if you look at the symptoms for 12 weeks they are quite general and not unlike ME but also not quite the same profile ....no cognitive, gut issues disruptive sleep etc I suspect that might be an artifice of the questions asked though/lack of responses/ability to articulate?


    There is some coverage here, although as I mentioned in a previous post on another thread the bbc at least don’t seem to be giving much credence or coverage to this “news”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-56601911
     
  9. Simon M

    Simon M Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    882
    Location:
    UK
    How many have long covid? And how many have something with symptoms as severe as mecfs?

    Yes, seems to be a lot less than you'd expect for glandular fever, I think that typically around 10% with GF meet CFS criteria at six months?

    However, there is a major caveat. Like a lot of "Long Covid" studies, these cohort studies only ask about the original Covid symptoms and not, for instance, cognitive problems/brain fog and post exertional malaise. If you have these other symptoms, and they were the cause of your daily activities being "limited a lot", then you wouldn't show up in the 3% figure I quoted.

    For this Coronavirus Infection Survey (CIS), the recorded symptoms listed in order of frequency at 12 wqeeks were (with frequency in brackets for a few):

    Fatigue (61%), headache, cough, myalgia (41%), sore throat, loss of smell, loss of taste, shortness of breath, nausea/vomiting, diarrhoea, abdominal pain (11%), fever (0%).​

    Other definitions of long covid
    a German study that also only measured Covid symptoms asked people if they felt they had recovered and 96% said yes, even though, while follow-up time varied a lot, the typical follow-up time would only have been seven weeks.

    Both this German study and the CIS study run by ONS have the advantage that they should be fairly representative. The ONS sample is constructed that way. The German sample used consecutive positive cases reported.

    "Other Long Covid prevalence studies are available".

    [CIS Sample 21,622 participants who tested positive for coronavirus, of whom 2,962 had at least one coronavirus symptom continuously to 12 weeks.]
     
    alktipping, FMMM1, Michelle and 5 others like this.
  10. mango

    mango Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,505
    Symptoms and Functional Impairment Assessed 8 Months After Mild COVID-19 Among Health Care Workers

    https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2778528?resultClick=1

    "Approximately 80% of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 report persistent symptoms several months after infection onset.1,2 However, knowledge of long-term outcomes among individuals with mild COVID-19 is scarce, and prevalence data are hampered by selection bias and suboptimal control groups.3,4 This cohort study investigated COVID-19–related long-term symptoms in health care professionals."

    Ny studie: Långtidsbesvären efter mild covid kartlagda
    https://www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/ny-studie-langtidsbesvaren-efter-mild-covid-kartlagda

    Google Translate, English
     
  11. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    12,299
    Location:
    Canada
    https://twitter.com/user/status/1379588811995369472


    https://twitter.com/user/status/1379793614621057025


    Peer reviews performed by people seemingly not aware of their own surroundings is a massive problem. When experts make blatantly ignorant assertions with high confidence, you know there are serious fundamental flaws in the system, the kind that take decades to fester and grow out of all reasonable proportions.

    Frankly at this point "peer-reviewed" has pretty much lost all meaning, it's clear that the process is very arbitrary, and on some issues it is fully dependent on the individual's beliefs and opinions, as much as their actual expert knowledge, if not more.
     
  12. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    12,299
    Location:
    Canada
    It's one of the most commonly reported problem. And frankly palpitations and low-grade fever are also pretty common. That they not see something that is obviously there suggests significant problems in their process. Let me guess, they used the severe dementia test again?
     
    alktipping and Wyva like this.
  13. mango

    mango Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,505
    Moved post

    According to an investigation done by Sveriges Radio Ekot (news programme by Sweden's national publicly funded radio broadcaster), the first national review ever, the number of people in Sweden who has been diagnosed with post covid/long covid so far is 16 000.
    16 000 svenskar har fått diagnosen postcovid
    https://sverigesradio.se/artikel/16-000-svenskar-har-fatt-diagnosen-postcovid

    Så många har postcovid
    https://sverigesradio.se/artikel/sa-manga-har-postcovid

    Comments by the Swedish Covid Association:
    The Swedish Covid Association and Läkare till läkare (Doctor to Doctor) wrote an opinion piece about this a month ago, highlighting the problems related to the inaction and the lack of data, contrasting it to the UK approach etc:

    Debatt: Brådskande vård försenas när statistik om långtidscovid saknas
    https://www.altinget.se/vard/artike...rsenas-nar-statistik-om-laangtidscovid-saknas

    "Immunitetsexperimentets offer" has blogged about the 16 000 news and SFAM's webinars here:
    https://ensamladbedomning.blogspot.com/2021/05/regeringen-stodkoper-konst-inte-bara.html
    (As a comparison, based on a prevalence rate of 0.4%, the estimated number of people in Sweden living with ME is 40 000. The number of people in Sweden who have been diagnosed with ME is unknown.)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 22, 2021
    Michelle, alktipping, Wyva and 4 others like this.
  14. Wyva

    Wyva Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,368
    Location:
    Budapest, Hungary
    Moved post
    Guardian article: Why are women more prone to long Covid?

    The explanation mostly comes from Akiko Iwasaki, and a more robust immune response, T cell activity, autoimmunity are mentioned but also that these kind of diseases are taken much less seriously due to the fact that women are disproportionately affected. ME/CFS and chronic Lyme get mentioned a couple of times for comparison and that these diseases can also benefit from long covid research.

    Many scientists studying long Covid believe that, in a proportion of cases, the virus may have triggered an autoimmune disease, causing elements of the immune system to produce self-directed antibodies known as autoantibodies, which attack the body’s own organs. Since December last year, Iwasaki and others have published studies that have identified elevated levels of more than 100 different autoantibodies in Covid-19 patients, directed against a range of tissues from the lining of blood vessels to the brain. While the level of some of these autoantibodies subsided naturally over time, others lingered. Iwasaki believes that if these self-directed antibodies remain in the blood of long Covid patients over the course of many months, it could explain many of the common symptoms, from cognitive dysfunction to clots, and dysautonomia – a condition where patients experience an uncomfortable and rapid increase in heartbeat when attempting any kind of activity.​

    https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/jun/13/why-are-women-more-prone-to-long-covid
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 14, 2021
  15. Arnie Pye

    Arnie Pye Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,048
    Location:
    UK
    Merged thread
    Mostly good article, worth reading, several mentions of ME/CFS.

    https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/jun/13/why-are-women-more-prone-to-long-covid

     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 14, 2021
  16. Peter Trewhitt

    Peter Trewhitt Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,637
    Unfortunately not as balanced an article in today’s London Times,

    Why is Britain now the capital of Long Covid?
    see https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/...FUd4nM_eL2-X_5D2Qbr2nFCMVdy2K1P09EMmGSdF1ygFs

    Sorry it is behind a paywall. It focuses on the biomedical/psychosomatic debate and gives several uncritical column inches to Jeremy Devine’s (Psychiatric registrar at McMaster University in Canada) recent ghastly article in the Wall Street Journal, we discussed here.

    Makes no mention of ME/CFS or PEM and implies the balanced response is to assume Long Covid has a significant psychiatric component. I don’t think it deserves a thread of its own.
     
  17. Adrian

    Adrian Administrator Staff Member

    Messages:
    6,479
    Location:
    UK
    I really think this debate is missing the point it should be about good and bad science - i.e. how theories are formed and tested. When we talk about theories such as the psychosomatic ones it should be up to the proponants to demonstrate evidence that makes them worth testing (and they have been working in the area for a long time)>
     
  18. shak8

    shak8 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,203
    Location:
    California
  19. chrisb

    chrisb Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,602
    Yes, but before we can assess the quality of the science we have first to ascertain what the purported science is. Now that we know that McMaster was working with a "Behavioural Medicine Unit" at St Joseph's Hospital Hamilton from 1975 and that that work was used in the development of the illness behaviour model, we have better ways of critiquing work coming out of that university. At least we know where to start looking.
     
    alktipping, Michelle, ukxmrv and 2 others like this.
  20. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,274
    Location:
    London, UK

Share This Page