I've summarised some information about the appointed NICE committee members in the attached pdf-document. I've focused on committee members with a BPS-bias, and did not delve into the lay members and ME-experts. This thread can be used to challenge or verify the information in the pdf-document and to add extra information about the NICE appointments. I hope that general discussion about the appointments, problems with the NICE process and discussion about strategies to adress these issues will be posted in other threads such as these: https://www.s4me.info/threads/nice-...deline-committee-has-now-been-published.6197/ https://www.s4me.info/threads/what-...ur-chances-in-the-nice-guideline-review.6406/ A letter has allready been written about the conflicts of interest of committee members Murphy, Daniels and Bond-Kendall demanding a partial exclusion regarding CBT/GET. It can be viewed here: https://www.s4me.info/threads/letter-to-nice-concerning-the-gdg-committee.6618/ I'm currently working on a letter regarding committee member Chris Burton (due to ill health it will take me a couple of days though). As a MUS-proponent he denies that ME/CFS is a real disease. People with such opinions should not be on a ME/CFS guideline committee IMHO. Additional information about Burton, that is not yet provided in the pdf-document, would be very much appreciated. Edit: This document focuses on papers, books and published opinions. Personal information about the committee members is not considered relevant and I urge everyone to respect these persons privacy.