Impacts of the 2024 change in US government on ME/CFS and Long Covid

restoring trust in public health institutions, encouraging innovation to lower health care costs, and improving research on Long Covid
Given that everything before Long Covid here is a lie, this would actually be hilarious if it were satirical comedy. But very unbelievable. Reality is so much dumber than fiction.

The only good thing that could come out of this is that the people who will be in charge are very likely to find all the mind-body garbage to be hippie horseshit. The only question is what other nonsense will fill the place instead.

For sure there will be very little interest in viruses, immunology and anything scientific, but with people like Walitt in charge and the complete mess that RECOVER has been so far, it's mostly a lateral move, from horseshit to different horseshit.
 
Nature: ‘High anxiety moment’: Biden’s NIH chief talks Trump 2.0 and the future of US science’

“Monica Bertagnolli details her concerns about Robert F. Kennedy Jr and his ‘Make America Healthy Again’ campaign”

“Our experience with COVID and with infectious disease over the last hundred years has taught us how critical it is that we not only stay on top of emerging threats by being prepared with countermeasures, but also because we do have so many more tools now to understand what viral infections can do to the body’s defences, like in long COVID.”
 
The Sick Times: Breaking: Vital Long COVID data taken down following Trump order
A key source of U.S. Long COVID data is now offline following a purge of information related to sexual orientation and gender identity ordered by President Donald Trump’s administration. The Household Pulse Survey, a data collection effort by the U.S. Census and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), is among many CDC datasets and pages that became unavailable on Friday.

Trump’s administration has ordered federal government staff to remove any references to “gender ideology” on public websites, NBC News reported, with a deadline of Friday afternoon. CDC staff were specifically threatened that the entire agency’s website would come down if the order was not followed by 5 PM Eastern time, according to the newsletter Garbage Day.

The Household Pulse Survey specifically reported Long COVID prevalence by sexual orientation and gender identity. It was one of the only federal sources tracking Long COVID, and reported data more frequently than other surveys.

The data from the Household Pulse Survey has been uploaded to the Internet Archive.
 
I think I was hoping I'd misread that and you wrote 98.5%. How much is 98.5 gig? Not that much, in the grand scheme of things?
It’s really hard to tell. Many research datasets are only a couple mb.
But maybe you have a big one that for some reason includes image or video files and it’ll easily take up 50-60 gb.

So I really don’t think file size is a very useful measurement here, would be more interesting to know what proportion of Datasets were saved.
 
HuffPost: “CDC's Advisers Demand Agency Provide Answers On Removal Of 'Critical' Health Data”

‘They want an explanation for why the agency took down information used for planning disaster relief, studying medical outcomes and helping at-risk populations’

“Nearly every member of an official advisory committee to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has signed an open letter demanding the agency explain why it removed troves of vital health datasets from its website.”
 
Information on ME and Long COVID may disappear from US government websites.

Friday, the Association of Healthcare Journalists alerted its members that any health science information they are accustomed to accessing online from US government websites, they should download. https://healthjournalism.org/blog/2...-know-about-disappearing-federal-health-data/

It's a short article and a fairly easy skim, even with my acquired reading fogginess. It doesn't mention ME or Long COVID specifically but the health topics impacted already are those that have been made subjects of controversy (as have ME/cfs and Long COVID historically). At the bottom of the article there's a quick list of suggestions for their journalist members to keep important information safe and accessible.

For our community, can we archive and share studies, articles, best practices information and other essential medical science that could be disappeared? When you want to share with a friend that info on anesthesia sensitivity in ME/cfs patients, for example, you could refer them to our own archive if the info has been disappeared elsewhere. It's not enough to bookmark and share links. We need downloads and uploads and stuff. I'm no digital archivist but some of you probably know what we need to do?
 
The Sick Times: Breaking: Vital Long COVID data taken down following Trump order


The data from the Household Pulse Survey has been uploaded to the Internet Archive.
I came to post about how to respond as a community to the disappearing info problem. I think this is something that needs its own thread: a planning and action thread for archiving and sharing data and articles that are important to us. See my reply later in this thread. This is a way we can really function as community for one another--preserving and sharing information before it gets disappeared.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Buckle up:

https://bsky.app/profile/darbysaxbe.bsky.social/post/3lhcvn4hxwk2o
BREAKING. From a program officer at the National Science Foundation, a list of keywords that can cause a grant to be pulled. I will be sharing screenshots of these keywords along with a decision tree. Please share widely. This is a crisis for academic freedom & science
https://bsky.app/profile/darbysaxbe.bsky.social/post/3lhcvzba7t22o
Decision tree that has been sent to Program Officers at NSF
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Buckle up:

https://bsky.app/profile/darbysaxbe.bsky.social/post/3lhcvn4hxwk2o
BREAKING. From a program officer at the National Science Foundation, a list of keywords that can cause a grant to be pulled. I will be sharing screenshots of these keywords along with a decision tree. Please share widely. This is a crisis for academic freedom & science
View attachment 25183View attachment 25184View attachment 25183 View attachment 25184 View attachment 25185View attachment 25186
https://bsky.app/profile/darbysaxbe.bsky.social/post/3lhcvzba7t22o
Decision tree that has been sent to Program Officers at NSFView attachment 25187

The horror of all of this! :cry: :mad:
 
Would people here be interested in a thread of the dangers and impacts of this sort of erasure — and on the threats to academic freedoms? (Would that break the rules?)

Everyone I know in real life is either “too busy to discuss”, not informed enough to have a genuine conversation, or is just ignoring all of this because they don’t want to face it, which makes this all really isolating for me.
 
Back
Top Bottom