1. Sign our petition calling on Cochrane to withdraw their review of Exercise Therapy for CFS here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 15th April 2024 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

Do treatments for paediatric chronic fatigue syndrome improve pain? a systematic review, Ascough et al, 2020 G535(P)

Discussion in 'Psychosomatic research - ME/CFS and Long Covid' started by John Mac, Oct 27, 2020.

  1. John Mac

    John Mac Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    926
    https://adc.bmj.com/content/105/Suppl_1/A189.2
     
  2. MEMarge

    MEMarge Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,750
    Location:
    UK
    Another Crawley et al.
    Do wish they'd stop going on about "treatment".

    In fact I wish they'd stop all they are doing in ME/CFS.
     
    rainy, cfsandmore, Sean and 9 others like this.
  3. Peter Trewhitt

    Peter Trewhitt Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,670
    This seems predicated on a belief that there is a treatment. At present there are no meaningful treatments.
     
    cfsandmore, Sean, alktipping and 6 others like this.
  4. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    12,464
    Location:
    Canada
    Why ask such an irrelevant question? It's really weird how these people both pretend to be experts but work as if they are completely naïve of everything, asking questions they know to be irrelevant, in large part because their own incompetence means pain is not even a recognized problem in ME? Unless somehow I guess pain is now a sub-symptom of "fatigue", or whatever. Who cares? Let's just make all the stuff up!

    Seems only to be about padding the resume of citations, since nobody ever checks the substance of such reviews.

    I mean seriously:
    What the fuck
    is wrong with them? What "initial treatment" are they even talking about here?! Seriously: WHAT INITIAL TREATMENT?!!!
    I repeat: WHAT INITIAL TREATMENT?! What even is the point of peer reviewers if they don't even check the substance of the words used?
     
    rainy, cfsandmore, alktipping and 2 others like this.
  5. Arnie Pye

    Arnie Pye Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,095
    Location:
    UK
    I can remember as a child that my father refused to believe that children could actually be in pain. I had a doctor who appeared to believe that too.

    Edit : I should expand on that... My father didn't believe in pain in children if it was from an invisible source.

    I also remember neither of my parents believed that children could be depressed. I think that was a common belief in the medical profession too.
     
    Last edited: Oct 28, 2020
    MEMarge, 2kidswithME, rainy and 3 others like this.
  6. ME/CFS Skeptic

    ME/CFS Skeptic Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,511
    Location:
    Belgium
    MEMarge, rainy, cfsandmore and 3 others like this.
  7. Denise

    Denise Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    472
    ARGH! How awful!
    When can we send all this sort of stuff to a toxic waste dump?
     
    MEMarge, rainy, cfsandmore and 5 others like this.
  8. Sean

    Sean Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    7,208
    Location:
    Australia
    However, patients who recover appear to have less pain than those who do not recover.

    On what planet does the definition of recovered include still having pain?
     
  9. cfsandmore

    cfsandmore Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    206
    Location:
    USA
    Behold the purpose, more $tudies are needed.

    I wonder how much research funding Professor Crawley brings in.
     
    MEMarge, 2kidswithME and rainy like this.
  10. Amw66

    Amw66 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,330
    Each paper simply reinforces how little such pediatricians actually know.

    For any to be termed " expert" is denigration of the term
     

Share This Page