1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Submissions sought for special issue of International Journal of Clinical Medicine (IJCM) on "Chronic Fatigue Syndrome"

Discussion in 'General ME/CFS News' started by Tom Kindlon, Nov 30, 2017.

  1. Tom Kindlon

    Tom Kindlon Established Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    505
    Just in case this is of interest to anyone. Not a journal I'm familiar with from memory so may not have much status.

     
    Obermann, Wonko, Samuel and 6 others like this.
  2. Valentijn

    Valentijn Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    1,518
    Likes Received:
    6,983
    Location:
    Netherlands
    It's a part of Scientific Research Publishing (SCRIP):
    Wikipedia has a longer discussion of their misdeeds :p
     
    Last edited: Nov 30, 2017
    Obermann, Wonko, Cheshire and 14 others like this.
  3. Lidia

    Lidia Established Member

    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    165
    @Valentijn is there a list of journals which can’t be referenced on Wikipedia? I tried to include a citation to a paper in Frontiers in Pediatrics (https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2017.00121/full) which was immediately reverted with a message saying this citation should not be on Wikipedia??? It is a peer-reviewed journal which meets WP:MEDRS, so I am wondering what the issue is.
     
    MEMarge and Samuel like this.
  4. Samuel

    Samuel Established Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    150
    am i the only crackpot who wishes that those who get conspicuously outraged over those two problems that have snappy epithets [and get press and academic interest] -- namely "predatory journals" and "fake news" -- would lend a !@#!$ hand over such things as pace and the lancet, bristol and qmul and kcl failing to act like universities, the cowardice of plos one, and smc literally-1930s-style propaganda?

    i GET that pj and fn are a problem. i KNOW they are a problem because i cannot think of many things that are more predatory and fake than those institutions' actions re m.e. WE are the prey. not elsevier!

    end of rant! brain not working well but i hope you get the idea! carry on!
     
    Last edited: Dec 1, 2017
    MEMarge, Amw66, Wonko and 2 others like this.
  5. Woolie

    Woolie Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    555
    Likes Received:
    3,964
    There are other rules, about not making entries based on the results of single studies (reviews, metanalyses and books are to be preferred) - could you have run into one of those?
     
    Valentijn likes this.
  6. Lidia

    Lidia Established Member

    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    165
    @Woolie no I don’t think so, as it’s an extensive review document. The message I received specifically said there was an issue with the Frontier journal, but I can’t imagine why as it’s legit???
     
    Woolie likes this.
  7. Woolie

    Woolie Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    555
    Likes Received:
    3,964
    Oh sorry, didn't realise it was a review. I'm surprised too. Frontiers publishes a range of articles (some great, some pretty bad), and is certainly not an outlet celebrated for its exceptional quality, but I can't see any reason why it should be subject to a blanket WP ban.
     
    MEMarge likes this.
  8. Amw66

    Amw66 Established Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    61
    Likes Received:
    283
    Frontiers published the international paediatric primer - given the issues with wiki this may explain a lot
     
    MEMarge and Woolie like this.

Share This Page