ME/CFS Skeptic
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
I'm also interested.
We're in the business of rehabilitation.
Thanks @Eagles !You can listen to the interview at
"We’re not going to go doing more and more tests to find out what was the virus because, frankly, even if we found it there's nothing we're going to do about it. We're in the business of rehabilitation."
Basically, "you got the flu so what, its gone now and you are malingering. Do our CBT and GET rehab and you will be cured of your faulty illness beliefs and deconditioning".
"We’re not going to go doing more and more tests to find out what was the virus because, frankly, even if we found it, there's nothing we're going to do about it. We're in the business of rehabilitation."
But they already looked under the streetlight. Surely you can't expect them to look any further? The streetlight is right there and just way more cozy than the darkness out there. There is nothing outside the cavern and the shadows on the wall are the only reality.Needless to say, they should be in the business of doing everything they can think of to try to falsify their hypothesis.
I think it's a bad idea to use to term 'malingering' when putting forth the views of those who have not used that term.
Its not a bad idea you just think it is.
You think it's a good idea?
I think it's unethical when Wessely and co try to make patients seem worse than they are, and the same is true if anyone does the same to Wessely.
Also, it harms attempts to draw attention to real problems with their work, allowing them to present their critics as either ill-informed or else deceptive.
Here's Wessely doing just that:
When people are not careful with their criticisms it makes it easier for Wessely to get away with the mistreatment of patients.
Basically, "you got the flu so what, its gone now and you are malingering. Do our CBT and GET rehab and you will be cured of your faulty illness beliefs and deconditioning".
This is my post in full @Esther12.
Its clearly me paraphrasing if you bother to read it properly as indicated by the fact that the whole statement is in inverted comas.
You are the one now bringing it to everyone's attention aligning it to Wessely as if I claimed it to be a direct quote.
Perhaps you shouldn't do that if you are so concerned about that issue.
I read what you said and followed the discussion fine. I respondedg to your paraphrasing by saying "I think it's a bad idea to use to term 'malingering' when putting forth the views of those who have not used that term."
I think that there is a danger that if other patients were to trust your re-interpretation of Wessely's words,
So within two sentences you go from realising it was paraphrasing to calling it "my reinterpretation of his words?
I think that there is a danger that if other patients were to trust your re-interpretation of Wessely's words