adambeyoncelowe
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
I wouldn't read too much into the stepcounts. They can be wildly inaccurate.This study obviosly didn’t include patients we in the community would call severe cases.
To be included you had to - within a 3 month window :
«completed the SF 36 questionnaire, worn a SensewearTM armband for five days, and undergone a cardiopulmonary exercise test»
You don’t do exercise tests as a severe ME patient.
Once again, the true horrors of just how bad this illness can get is hidden.
I would also argue the study also could imply misuse/overuse of the diagnosis, when patient they classified as mild cases have near normal stepcounts. Don’t most of diagnosis guidlines set an loss of about half normal functioning, or similar, to use the ME diagnosis?
Anyhow, still good that studies are done to validate functional loss, and scales to objective measures. And this is a valuble reference as is.
Still, just wish scientist would communicate with patients communities, learn about the illness many faces before once again - probably without realising - once again hiding the sickest of us.
It's the CPETs that makes me think they didn't have severe patients, though.