If I have anything wrong (and I'm sure I do), please let me know and I'll correct things - or post below. The meeting was a bit like drinking from a fire hose, with a lot of information and a lot of people coming from a lot of different backgrounds with different levels of knowledge about Long Covid and ME/CFS. I didn't aim to note all the news. Some items already have specific threads in the S4ME forum.
Emily Taylor (e.taylor@solvecfs.org) and Jessie Brown led the meeting and would be good initial points of contact to followup most of the items.
April 19 Advocacy Day
My understanding is that this is a USA activity, where people will be meeting (online) with US politicians to talk about Long Covid. The advocates to talk to politicians have been identified, but Solve ME/CFS is looking for volunteers to help double check the advocates are organised for the meetings. This work will involve contacting around 10 people, and checking everything is sorted, to avoid the problem of a politician sitting waiting for a meeting and there being no advocate on the other end of the zoom call.
Data Harmonisation
Sadie Whittaker of Solve ME talked about the You+ME patient registry. She is keen to harmonise data collection efforts and is interested to work with anyone collecting Long Covid data. There are upcoming webinars on Long Covid research.
US - ICD-10 Code campaign
Much of the rest of the world uses ICD-11 to code illnesses. But the US uses ICD-10 with some codes specific to the US. The codes are used for important purposes - for reporting to government, for determining eligibility for benefits and insurance cover. Lisa ? and Mary Dimmock
@Medfeb have been working on a campaign to add specific codes. I think a major aim of their suggestions is to separate out the various sorts of Post Acute Covid-19 Sequelae. ICD-10 doesn't have an ME/CFS code, just a CFS code. Lisa and Mary don't want to encourage use of the CFS code for Long Covid, as it brings a lot of baggage, and is equated with Chronic Fatigue.
NIH response to the Alliance's letter of 25 February 2021
NIH's Dr Patterson, Head of the Engagement Workgroup for Post Acute Covid-19 Sequelae, has replied to the letter, interested in a meeting with the Alliance. Emily noted that meetings will be held with just a core group rather than the wider alliance. The collective position will be that the definition of PACS needs to be narrowed, to separate out the cases of tissue damage from Long Covid.
It was note that the NIH has received over 200 applications for the first PACS RFA. Applications are now closed and are being considered.
Notice of relevant events
(some have been discussed on the forum already e.g. UK Royal Society Prof Brian Cox)
Research America Alliance Member call with Dr Koroshetz, Director of NIH NINDS - 15 April
This will be about NIH's work on Long Covid, including a soon-to-be-launched event. It probably won't be recorded. Emily is able to submit questions - you can send questions to her in advance of the call.
Working groups
A range of working groups are being formed in the Alliance e.g. International; BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, People of Colour); Online Presence; Research. It is hoped that these will drive things forward.
I mentioned Science for ME - that we are a resource for advocates and researchers.