Suffolkres
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
I have also been consulted on the Suffolk and North Essex plan. Suffolkres knows a lot about this.
Last time I spoke to a person drawing up a commissioning plan there was no guarantee of physician involvement and it looked very much like just buying in BACME services as far as I could gather. I voiced my concerns at that point.
The key problem here I see is the acceptance of the idea of a 'multidisciplinary team'. That is in this context a term used to diffuse and offload clinical responsibility to people with no idea what to do. You may well get something that looks like what is in the NICE guideline but even Charles has made it clear that that is not good enough - it needs to be physician led and to not involve people who therap for the sake of therapping.
Yes. Jo.
You were perfectly right and clear. ..
That's been our stance as coproducers.
That's what we have stuck out for and insisted, clinic/ Consultant led MDT.
We have been in complaints process with CEO ICB Board since this became a red line issue in July.
Spec and Pathway was agreed in draft
Version 7?
Friday last...told it would be out as Prior Information Notice but gone down another black hole....
Just had conversation with patient rep lead who will do a ,' look here sunshine' request as today still isn't on contract finder...
May be more on this later after today's request.
Our service in good old days, used to focus on Severely Affected house bound with 30% of referrals in receipt of consultation at home..... ddomiciliary is vital we say.
Last edited: