Dx Revision Watch
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
...There used to be Amok Bansal and Saul Berkovitz but I am not sure either deals with ME/CFS now...
My understanding is that Dr Bansal sees patients privately since retiring from the NHS.
...There used to be Amok Bansal and Saul Berkovitz but I am not sure either deals with ME/CFS now...
My understanding is that Dr Bansal sees patients privately since retiring from the NHS.
I had appointments with one of those retired physicians every year for several years, & he also produced a report to help with my DWP claim - the report & the letters to my NHS GP refer to "ME/CFS" throughout.There are two retired physicians in the UK who have a special interest in ME/CFS but both probably always refer to it as ME.
I had appointments with one of those retired physicians every year for several years, & he also produced a report to help with my DWP claim - the report & the letters to my NHS GP refer to "ME/CFS" throughout.
A case from the US from 2021, https://www.meaction.net/2021/01/29...-person-with-severe-me-to-mental-health-ward/It may be that people with very severe ME/CFS in the USA are getting gastrostomies or being treated as psychiatric or whatever but we don't seem to have any information on that.
This is how I've understood NICE Guidelines to operate too, that they're not compulsory as such, not rules written in stone, but guidance that one should follow for Best Practice. But to come out and say NICE Guidelines "don't apply at this hospital" is just outright flouting of Best Practice.Following NICE guidelines is not, as I understand it, compulsory.
But ignoring them or doing an end run around them via re-diagnosis away from ME/CFS, particularly in such a wilful arrogant reckless manner, is running the risk of serious lawsuits, and even being struck of the medical register in the worst case.
Which may be what it will take. Being non-compulsory is not a get-out-of-jail-free card. Guidelines remove the excuse of not knowing.
I know someone who is an NHS casualty Doctor (though they work through an agency - lots do!) they tell me that they're extremely careful i.e. to meticulously record care & why they've done "X" - legally defensible. They regularly gets asked if they'd like to work somewhere new i.e. by former colleagues - excellent Doctor.Following NICE guidelines is not, as I understand it, compulsory.
But ignoring them or doing an end run around them via re-diagnosis away from ME/CFS, particularly in such a wilful arrogant reckless manner, is running the risk of serious lawsuits, and even being struck of the medical register in the worst case.
Which may be what it will take. Being non-compulsory is not a get-out-of-jail-free card. Guidelines remove the excuse of not knowing.
Good links - it could be a good idea for the families of these patients to get the Care Quality Commission to look into these cases.
One of the suggestions I've heard is to do whole genome sequence studies/rare variant studies on families with more than 1 member effected - including at least 1 severe.I had bloods taken today lovely young trainee nurse doing a home visit. My usual lady is on holiday. My young lady today told me she also has ME and has had it since she was at school. I also discovered that her sister who is also a nurse, and also has ME/CFS also had it as a child. They had difficult at school always being told that they weren't working hard enough. They both work reduced hours and do pacing. Their mother developed ME/CFS when she was in her mid twenties and is very disabled now. How on earth does this hospital treat it's own staff?
ETA: probably denies ill health retirement, as happened to me on the grounds that it was not a permanent condition. Mine was from an 'expert' engaged by Oxford Brookes University. I reached state retirement age at the end of March.
One of the suggestions I've heard is to do whole genome sequence studies/rare variant studies on families with more than 1 member effected - including at least 1 severe.
Also, the general healthcare culture in the US, for all its faults, is far more consumer-oriented; by contrast in the UK there still persists the attitude that the patient should simply be grateful for whatever they get from the NHS.