Jonathan Edwards
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Is there an opportunity to push for this through the group you sit on (which deals with research priorities?)?
No. It was about research and is winding up.
Is there an opportunity to push for this through the group you sit on (which deals with research priorities?)?
But the point is to make the request early and follow the legal pathway, so eventually the hospital can explain to the court why the staff didn’t follow the reasonable request.Its absolutely not an excuse! But in answer to that question - yes often they do, at least according to the autistic people i know.
And it appears that for the ones who wouldnt do that, ME/CFS is a special case in their minds anyway - its not like being autistic, or even having a brain injury or something, - because being autistic, for those who have any awareness at all, is understood to be neurological & not a form of hysteria/conversion disorder. So it seems like for many medical staff, sensory difficulties due to autism are 'real', while sensory difficulties due to ME are not. Or at least that in autistic people they are not in any way under the person's control as they believe they are in ME.
I don’t think in 2024 it’s an excuse that a HCP doesn’t understand sensory difficulties, it happens not infrequently.
I don’t have a strong expectation the request will be followed, but that it may be leverage and/or be pursued as a legal challenge.I am afraid that this is all about 2024. It didn't happen in 1984. My family member is a medical professional used to wards at night from the other side. Apparently things have changed out of all recognition the last twenty years. Hospitals cannot get night staff other than those who really don't care a damn about patients. And I am talking about the most prestigious university hospital neurology ward in the country here.
But the point is to make the request early and follow the legal pathway, so eventually the hospital can explain to the court why the staff didn’t follow the reasonable request.
I don’t know how many ways I can make this point about an easier legal challenge on the failure to make reasonable adjustments, which isn’t tied to a diagnosis and so eliminates the “it’s not ME, it’s a psychiatric disorder” issueHave you been in a hospital recently and seen the reality?
In most wards allocating side rooms is a matter of deciding which patients are most at risk of dying from catching infections from other patients, or passing on their infection to someone else. It is pretty much like it was in 1880 these days.
Per capita ?Reminds me of my last job (I've just retired from a junior level post in policy development) - you're strategy is a "go to" - problem x --- anyone else got a strategy to address this?
If there are good examples from other jurisdictions, countries, then worth highlighting this.
I agree with Jonathan - e.g. numbers in England are nX higher than Scotland, Wales & NI.
I think part of the problem is that for a healthy person lots of bustle & noise & clatter is unpleasant, but nurses (in general, as evidenced by their actions) dont care about whether your hospital experience is 'pleasant' or not. They dont expeience it as loud because they've gotten used to tuning it out and the patients arent humans equal to them they are in some way "them", they dont see themselves as gossiping loudly in the middle of the night in someones bedroom.
And to add to the problem where these specific cases are concerned... honestly, prior to my developing ME i would have seen Millie (for example, but i saw a video of Carla on the % news piece) i'd have see them in their black eye masks, lying there limp & thin, & whimpering when the curtain was opened &, depending on what mood i was in i'd have thought 'oh for F's sake a tiny bit of light like that cant possibly be that painful!', (to my shame i wasnt the most compassionate person to PwME when in my ignorance i believed it was 'extreme tiredness'. i'd honestly have thought this was a problem of 'teenage girl molycoddled by her parents' syndrome).
Or at best i'd have thought 'ah bless her, of course the light hurts when you're not used to it, i know its hard now but you'll soon get used to it, if i open the curtain it'll help you in the long run'.
(yes i know, prior to having ME i was an ignorant ____!)
I dont know how to get accross to them that its not that, it just not a problem of exposure - where you lie in the dark/silence so 'of course' light & sound are painful & extreme when you first reintroduce them.
But rather it is the opposite... the more exposure there is then the louder/brighter/more painful it gets. So the longer i have spent in dark & silence, the more sound & light i can tolerate. ITs as i begin to 'tire'... its as exposure continues that it becomes more & more painful.
So if i've been resting for long enough & then i turn the computer/light on, after the immediate ouch that we all get when turning the light on initially... but after a moment or 2 i can turn the main light on, and turn some music on too & enjoy it, but after a short while the sound & light become uncomfortable, then painful, & then agony. If i turn the light off the sound goes from agony to merely painful & vice versa.
So Exposure reduces tolerance it does not improve it. IF only it made it better! but do they are think we are so thick as to still have the problem if exposure made it better?!... we are not imbeciles! even at age 12, and parents certainly arent. Of course every parent said 'you need to get used to it' to their kids before accepting that exposure was making it worse.
I dont know how to communicate that to doctors/nurses in a simple way they can understand, because they all just persist in hearing 'you're sensitive because you're not used to it', regardless of how much you explain.
I think its not helped by the use of the word 'sensitive' or 'intolerant' but i haven't been able to work out a better term.
But i am just recovering from a 3hr trip onto a very small hospital ward (2 beds) for an investigatory procedure, i explained till i was blue in the face, they were otherwise kind & helpful, & they understood a wheelchair....
they did not understand any kind of sensory difficulties.
They dimmed a light but continued crashing about and shouting, and then turning the light back on... ''oh arent you used to the light yet?'', & i explained, but they just couldnt hear it.
It was awful, just awful it made me so ill, & i was only there a short while. What Millie & co are experiencing must be a hell of epic proportion.
No, I’m housebound.Have you been in a hospital recently and seen the reality?
In most wards allocating side rooms is a matter of deciding which patients are most at risk of dying from catching infections from other patients, or passing on their infection to someone else. It is pretty much like it was in 1880 these days.
Depends on who is writing the protocol.Excellent.
So Exposure reduces tolerance it does not improve it.
This.Exposure reduces the tolerance
Same with exercise. Almost like it’s a consistent issue with ME!
We are still having to play the get stuff on the (relevant) formal public record so nobody can say that they couldn't possibly have known, that it is not reasonable to expect them be informed of these things.I don’t have a strong expectation the request will be followed, but that it may be leverage and/or be pursued as a legal challenge.
Depends on who is writing the protocol.
Yea "in 1984" systems were in place to train lots of nurses --- now they system trawls the world + it's a competitive international market + the UK presumably isn't paying well in comparison to others +++ --- perhaps explains the outcome!I am afraid that this is all about 2024. It didn't happen in 1984. My family member is a medical professional used to wards at night from the other side. Apparently things have changed out of all recognition the last twenty years. Hospitals cannot get night staff other than those who really don't care a damn about patients. And I am talking about the most prestigious university hospital neurology ward in the country here.
I think that is it and the ME service stopped accepting patients from outside of the Leeds area as they have too many patients.
There are no severe/very severe beds in the NHSIf it is the same one, then they don't seem to be set up for patients as severe as Carla or Millie, or am I missing something?
The thread for this clinic is here: https://www.s4me.info/threads/united-kingdom-leeds-and-york-partnership-cfs-centre.13916/
Compare with this situation.
Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) > Fact Sheets > Yale Medicine Covid-19
and this view of MIS publicly expressed and reported on 2 July 1999 in the Bristol Evening Post
Results for 'simon wessely' | Between 1st Jan 1950 and 31st Dec 1999 | British Newspaper Archive
"is triggered by media hype public concerns about food safety and modern stress levels Professor Simon Wessely said: “MSI is essentially a mental illness which spreads through sight or association “People see or hear of one person..."
I'll take a wild guess at what the rest of this is referring to 'hysteria'.
Apologies, just skimmed a bit through recent posts and wondered about that Wessely reference...
Not sure what you searched for regarding Wessely - but got confused and thought your reference meant Wessely classified Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS) as 'Mass Sociogenic illness' (MSI or MPI).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_psychogenic_illness
Maybe a typo in the article? Or did he really say that MIS is MSI?