UK:ME Association funds research for a new clinical assessment toolkit in NHS ME/CFS specialist services, 2023

Discussion in 'ME/CFS research news' started by InitialConditions, May 8, 2023.

  1. NelliePledge

    NelliePledge Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,666
    Location:
    UK West Midlands
    That was my thought at the start of the project- yay let’s get rid of the Chalder questionnaire. But “hey it’s not as bad as Chalder” isn’t the standard we should be accepting when 90k of PWME money and a hell of a lot of hours input on filling in the proposed replacements is being spent on this.
     
    Last edited: May 21, 2024
    Missense, Nightsong, EzzieD and 13 others like this.
  2. MrMagoo

    MrMagoo Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    399
    Are they using the FUNCAP questionnaires? Because they’re quite good, validated and already exist
     
    Missense, alktipping, Kitty and 8 others like this.
  3. NelliePledge

    NelliePledge Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,666
    Location:
    UK West Midlands
    And also included in the visible app
     
    Missense, alktipping, Kitty and 8 others like this.
  4. MrMagoo

    MrMagoo Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    399
    I just did mine :) that’s what made me think. The options for reply are really”ME/CFS”.
     

    Attached Files:

    Missense, alktipping, Kitty and 3 others like this.
  5. Maat

    Maat Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    249
    I cannot see that an apology has been received, or have I missed it?

    If a public apology has not been received, I'm adding the comments of Sarah Tyson @Robert 1973 refers to, and this thread, as additional evidence in the part of the cause of action referencing historical and ongoing 'reputational damage' to the patient group with ME, CFS, CFS/ME and ME/CFS - Article 10 Human Rights Act 1998. This is only one element of the causes of action in the accumulated evidence upon which I'm taking specialist legal advice. Every time, I have to re-read it, it has the same impact on me.

    ETA:

     
    Binkie4, Missense, alktipping and 8 others like this.
  6. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    53,228
    Location:
    UK
    No apology has been received from Sarah Tyson, and the MEA in the person of its chair of Trustees, Neil Riley, merely says our complaint about Sarah Tyson's post is 'noted' and they have full confidence in her.
    See their letter, a copy of which is posted in the letters thread:
    https://www.s4me.info/threads/open-...g-proms-led-by-sarah-tyson.37937/#post-524843
     
    Sean, Missense, alktipping and 9 others like this.
  7. Hutan

    Hutan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    27,591
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    Just popping in to do a bit of catastrophising and hysteria, as is my wont.

    I did wonder if the Tyson, Gladwell et al were experimenting with a wide range of questions, with the plan to work out what questions were most useful. And it seems that they are. But that in itself is a problem. If you are going to survey a whole lot of tasks of daily living and socialising and work, what then do you leave out when shortening the survey? How can you know that you haven't left out something that is crucial to the particular patient? While you might decide that the sample patients gave similar answers about dancing and walking a mile, one particular person may value dancing greatly, and sacrifice a lot to keep doing it.

    And that takes us back to what people have already said - a good occupational therapist or the like will be very used to having a chat with someone and working out what particular challenges and desires the patient in front of them has, and knowing whether they have some solutions to offer.

    90 questions, or 45 - this survey is not going to capture the patient's experience. I assume the idea is that the therapist has 45 opportunities to demonstrate some sort of improvement and justify their existence. But, instead, just have a satisfaction survey asking patients how satisfied they were with the assistance, and any ideas for improvements.

    Looking at the questions from the latest survey, I genuinely would find many almost impossible to answer. Things fluctuate. The answers I give would be vulnerable to framing by the therapist. Kitty said it well:

    And so we come back to the wearable technology and the apps. We are seeing them used more and more - they are accurate and feasible. They can give standardised data that can be compared patient to patient, and at different time points for an individual patient.
    I've said it before, and it's still true - this MEA project is an anachronism (well, I don't think I used exactly that word, but it applies). And the risk is that there is manipulation of the data as it is collected and when it is analysed, in order to harm people with ME/CFS.


    That is incredibly patronising and also ironic given Sarah Tyson's behaviour. This forum was set up with the explicit aim of allowing patients, clinicians and researchers to engage.

    Giving staff in the UK ME/CFS rehabilitation clinics tools that allow them to keep inflicting the harm they have been doing for decades while continuing to think that they are helping is not useful. Equipping them with validated wearable technology and the skills to use it and teach patients to use it would be a much more worthwhile endeavour. It would mean that the staff got objective feedback on the success or otherwise of their interventions - and it is that that is likely to produce improvements. A useful side benefit would be that good objective outcomes could be used in research of treatment effectiveness.


    Others have said it well. 'Better than the Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire' is too low a bar to aim for. And, we need more than 'this project gets more people thinking about how to try to make more appropriate measures' when it is using 90,000 pounds of scarce research funding. Also I think you are ignoring the substantial harm that a battery of vague hard-to-answer easily manipulated questions can cause.
     
  8. MEMarge

    MEMarge Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,805
    Location:
    UK
    The following extracts from the FAQ re a mental health PROM are not at all reassuring. Too many concerning statements to highlight.

    "How I feel and my heath changes all the time, how can I complete the questionnaire?
    We know how you feel can change on a day-to-day basis. How you feel now may be very different from how you felt yesterday or how you will feel in a few hours’ time, especially if you take medications to support your health and wellbeing.

    The questionnaires are meant to give us a snapshot of your health. We know they give us a very limited view of how you have been feeling recently, but it’s important that you complete them thinking about how you feel at the time."

    How will the results be reported back to me and my healthcare worker?
    Once you submit your questionnaire you won’t be able to save it or print it, however your responses will be immediately available to your healthcare worker.

    You can ask for feedback during your appointment; although feedback will be dependent on staff accessing the information, and this may not always be possible depending on where your appointment is.

    If your appointment is at a clinic, your healthcare worker will probably be able to share your answers with you and compare this with previous answers you may have given. They will also be able to talk to you about what this means.

    How are the questionnaires going to be used?
    Your responses will be used to help us understand the problems you are having, find out more about your health and wellbeing and quality of life, and to monitor changes in these.
    The responses can help you and your healthcare team make an informed decision about what treatment is most suitable for your condition, needs and circumstances.

    By filling in your answers at the beginning of your care you can get a really good idea of where you are starting from. Filling in your answers again at a later date, either during or at the end of your treatment, can be a useful record of where you are making progress and how well your treatment is working for you. Any positive change is an achievement and can give you confidence in managing your health and wellbeing. We don’t always expect to see constant improvements, as we know there are many things that can impact on a person’s health and wellbeing e.g. life events. If there isn’t a lot of change, or your ratings get lower, we might use this as a starting point to discuss making some changes to your treatment.

    Whatever happens, completing PROMs over a period of time helps to build up a picture of your care. This can highlight areas that are meaningful and important to you and can be a very useful tool to help you understand the parts of your life where you need the most help, and how well the help you are getting is working.

    there are many things that can impact on a person’s health and wellbeing e.g. life events. If there isn’t a lot of change, or your ratings get lower, we might use this as a starting point to discuss making some changes to your treatment.

    Whatever happens, completing PROMs over a period of time helps to build up a picture of your care. This can highlight areas that are meaningful and important to you and can be a very useful tool to help you understand the parts of your life where you need the most help, and how well the help you are getting is working.

    https://www.southwestyorkshire.nhs....sures-proms/proms-frequently-asked-questions/

    ETA to bold the heading so people know where it's from
     
    Last edited: May 24, 2024
    Sean, alktipping, Maat and 5 others like this.
  9. JellyBabyKid

    JellyBabyKid Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    271
    why would it not be possible to download a .pdf? That is how I would expect this to work; it is widely used elsewhere.

    Why can't patients have a copy for their own reference and monitoring?

    so patients are expected to complete these epic questionnaires as the basis for an appointment and the discussions therein, but staff might not have access to the questionnaires

    I could be catastrophising here, but I see a serious discrepancy in this proposal.
     
    MeSci, Sean, alktipping and 11 others like this.
  10. JellyBabyKid

    JellyBabyKid Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    271
    I did the HOPE for Long Covid course, on an app on my phone and they had a couple of weeks or so on figuring out what matters most to you, with fun videos and helpful prompts. I now have a list on an index card, super helpful. Surely, given this already exists and is a self paced, easily accessible NHS supported course this would be more helpful here?

    Surely this is a tick list? Pain, fatigue, sleep, PoTS, social care, mental health support, brain fog, breathlessness etc.

    As a person very prone to overthinking and over analysing everything and passionate about spreadsheets and lists, this feels overcomplicated and unnecessarily opaque and fails to see the wood for the trees.

    Am I missing something? Are they planning to use some sort of statistical analysis on the data that it needs such a standardised format for answers? I think this is in danger of trying to fit square pegs in round holes and missing valuable and very relevant details - measuring ME in this standardised way feels too much like trying to knit fog.
     
    Sean, alktipping, bobbler and 8 others like this.
  11. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    53,228
    Location:
    UK
    How incredibly dehumanising and patronising. How is this even allowed in these days of full access to our medical records. I will never fill in a questionnaire that goes in my medical records in future.

    Trust the expert, they know more about your health from a few answers to inadequate questions than you know from your daily lived experience.
    I still maintain this is all about creating records that give the impression of listening to patients without having to get involved in the messy business of listening to patients. Bah humbug.


    Absolutely. That's why we need to see the algorithm the intend to use to create quantitative data from answers to their chosen questions.

    Worse than CFQ and SF 36. At least with those we know what the algoritm is and can see how useless and easily manipulated they are.
     
    MeSci, Sean, alktipping and 10 others like this.
  12. MrMagoo

    MrMagoo Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    399
    I said I wanted to do some reading and I have not done it (yet!) but one theme I wanted to revisit is that of the “PROMS creates a data set which can be used in research” I feel like that it was said it wouldn’t/was silent, then it has been said. Over the course of the MEA announcements and Sarah Tyson’s posts here, it’s been inconsistent.

    Further to that, how and why the HECK you’d use the rubbish out of this debacle as a data set (rubbish in=rubbish out)

    and why aren’t they using FUNCAP
    And why are they trying to create their own less useful version of FUNCAP

    This has all the preparation, training and forethought of a task on “The Apprentice” - none. Like someone trying to do an approximation of creating a toolkit.
     
    EzzieD, Sean, alktipping and 9 others like this.
  13. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    53,228
    Location:
    UK
    I have just been reminding myself of FUNCAP.

    Here's our thread about it:
    https://www.s4me.info/threads/asses...stionnaire-2023-sommerfelt-et-al.35464/page-3

    And here's a link to try it yourself:
    https://raffbenato.github.io/funcap55/

    It's so much better than anything on this MEA project, I ask again, why did the MEA fund this project.

    It would be possible to put together a series of resources already existing that would be more useful than anything being produced here.
     
  14. Maat

    Maat Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    249
  15. MrMagoo

    MrMagoo Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    399
    I just saw the profile for Sarah Tyson on the BACME conference thread. A bit surprised she’s involved with Physios For ME as a “lay representative” as well as DoHSC plan for ME
    (See just above bullet points)
    IMG_2638.png
     
  16. Maat

    Maat Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    249
    Ditto to the comments regarding the inability to print off any completed questionnaires. No guarantee that clinic HCP will be able to access them - what's the point?

    These form part of your healthcare records and must be accessible to the patient.

    I've just completed the FUNCAP for the first time. Prior to completing it, with a total of 16 years experience of this illness at all levels, with the last 12 at the severe end of this illness, I would asseess my level of ME/CFS as severe bordering on very severe.

    It took me over an hour to complete the 55 questions. The results confirmed what my experience as an expert patient in this illness already told me, that I'm severe/very severe. I've saved it as a pdf and will be emailing it to my carer, and printing off a copy for my medical file for her to reference for others. All in all, a very useful and more importantly, accurate questionnaire tool for the patient's benefit.
     
    Amw66, EzzieD, MeSci and 12 others like this.
  17. MrMagoo

    MrMagoo Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    399
    Yes South Yorks mental health has earned a place on my DNA (do NOT attend).

    FUNCAP is lovely to fill in, 0-5 answer levels stay displayed at the top of the page. Other NHS PROMS use an app, it’s 2024! Instead I fear PROMS will be printed out and filled in by hand…everything about it feels outdated.

    Today, or this week but I didn’t read it until today, Visible launched the option of guided breathing. I tried it out and my heart rate slowed down nicely. I went into the “resting” HR zone which always eludes me.
    It’s got a built-in daily reminder to do it, which I will. Apps. The future.
     
    Amw66, EzzieD, Kitty and 9 others like this.
  18. JemPD

    JemPD Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,124
    I'm not supporting these PROMS, but just to say FWIW that i loathe filling in questionnaires online, i find it much more difficult and taxing than doing it on paper.
    I detest my smart phone, and apps and the modern obsession to do everything through a f'ing APP!
    AGGHH!! its all a lot harder for me, i'd much sooner a print out and that includes the FUNCAP. I also cant get on with white text on black background which everyone seems to think is sooo much easier, it isnt easier for all of us it hurts my eyes so much.
     
    EzzieD, Nellie, MeSci and 10 others like this.
  19. alktipping

    alktipping Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,229
    I believe its called networking you know making contacts that look really good on a cv to benefit ones career . to many people are promoted to positions based on who they know .
     
    EzzieD, Nellie, Kitty and 3 others like this.
  20. MrMagoo

    MrMagoo Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    399
    I agree- white text on dark kills my eyes!
    Anything on an app should of course also be easily available in other formats like paper. Bit harder to print out an app version of a paper only questionnaire.
     
    alktipping, EzzieD, Kitty and 8 others like this.

Share This Page