Tuller / Trial By Error: The Crawley Chronicles, Resumed

Barry said:
Pondering this earlier today, I begin to wonder if this necessarily is all premeditated, as I've tended to think. Maybe a major factor really is just sheer lack of professional competence. Maybe they just don't have a clue how to run clinical trials. It's as if they just slept through those aspects of their education, or thought it didn't matter. How can else can they so blatantly fly in the face of established scientific wisdom?
Click to expand...
I suspect she operates under the "principle" If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.
Reality won't cooperate with their psychological nonsense so distort reality to fit the lies.
 
Last edited:
Barry said:
Pondering this earlier today, I begin to wonder if this necessarily is all premeditated, as I've tended to think. Maybe a major factor really is just sheer lack of professional competence. Maybe they just don't have a clue how to run clinical trials. It's as if they just slept through those aspects of their education, or thought it didn't matter. How can else can they so blatantly fly in the face of established scientific wisdom?
Click to expand...
Amazing what a person will believe, or deny, when their status, reputation, power, and especially income depend on it.
 
Sbag said:
the other problem with using teenagers might be that their bodies are going through so much change anyway, that self reporting on how tired they feel is going to be even less accurate. Therefore this would imply that there is even more of a need for proper scientific/biological results to illustrate any improvements.
Click to expand...
I have two teenage sons who come home from school every day, go upstairs, lie down and fall asleep. Absolutely nothing to do with ME. My 15 year old only started doing this a couple of weeks ago. Now he's just like his big brother, who does it most days. Teenagers innit?
 
Binkie4 said:
https://www.actionforme.org.uk/uploads/pdfs/cmrc-board-minutes-101017-draft.pdf

Minutes of the Oct 2017 CMRC meeting
1. CS was not listed at all. Is this an admin error, or something more? Does CS remain a member of tthe CMRC? I don't think he is participating here yet. Perhaps @Jonathan Edwards knows.
2. Item 6.1 is interesting. Also 4 and 5.
Click to expand...

I think Charles still represents MEA on the CMRC but this may have been a smaller meeting. In fact it seems to have been so small that only Holgate and Crawley were there, bar some media people.

Hopefully Charles will log in here soon enough. He said he was having a rest from social media but I think he will be very pleased with the Biobank session yesterday.
 
I am more and more baffled why Miss Crawley is allowed to continue doing "research". It must be political reasons. There are so many flaws in her studies, it's so obviously bad I realize as I keep on getting information. I wonder if this might hold for most of psychology "research", and therefore nobody complains (apart from us activistis and bio-medical fake-scientists).

I am also still shocked that the Lightning Process was state funded. In fact, it's a scandal the more I think about it. How was that possible?!
 
Jonathan Edwards said:
I think Charles still represents MEA on the CMRC but this may have been a smaller meeting. In fact it seems to have been so small that only Holgate and Crawley were there, bar some media people.

Hopefully Charles will log in here soon enough. He said he was having a rest from social media but I think he will be very pleased with the Biobank session yesterday.
Click to expand...
He certainly deserves a rest after gruelling rounds of Q and A at Unrest around the country!
 
TiredSam said:
I have two teenage sons who come home from school every day, go upstairs, lie down and fall asleep. Absolutely nothing to do with ME. My 15 year old only started doing this a couple of weeks ago. Now he's just like his big brother, who does it most days. Teenagers innit?
Click to expand...

I can only speak from looking back as a teenager, but it would have been the worst time in my life to get some accurate data by asking me questions that involve self awareness, mood, fatigue, etc. It's almost like society already noticed this and gave the phenomenon a name.

I think that parental ratings would be much more accurate to see if there is any correlation with the trialists.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom