1. Sign our petition calling on Cochrane to withdraw their review of Exercise Therapy for CFS here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 18th March 2024 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

Trial By Error: A Plea to Fiona Godlee on a Familiar Topic

Discussion in 'Psychosomatic news - ME/CFS and Long Covid' started by Andy, May 16, 2019.

  1. Amw66

    Amw66 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,262
  2. Andy

    Andy Committee Member

    Messages:
    21,810
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    http://www.virology.ws/2019/06/03/t...nformation-request-to-bristol-about-lp-study/
     
  3. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    12,299
    Location:
    Canada
  4. chrisb

    chrisb Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,602
    At what stage does one bring to the attention of the Chairman of the board of Directors the potential for reputational damage to the brand?
     
    DokaGirl, MSEsperanza and Barry like this.
  5. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,274
    Location:
    London, UK
    Who is the chairman of the board then?

    Edit: seems to be Jay Lippincott
     
  6. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    8,385
    Excellent letters @Jonathan Edwards and @dave30th.

    I really am interested to hear how UoB might seek to still justify endorsing a treatment for children which they are instructed to remain silent about, and which there are no published details of. Continuing support after this has be so clearly pointed out to them would be the final nail in their reputational coffin I would have thought.
     
    DokaGirl, Cheshire, ahimsa and 8 others like this.
  7. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    12,299
    Location:
    Canada
    The strategy seems to be hoping it goes away. It works in politics. Not so much in science.

    Which is, of course, a massive ethical failure. I guess they thought they were invincible, but fully embracing magical pseudoscience to the level of LP was a huge mistake. I guess it shows that the clear answer to "what were they thinking?" is: nothing, they were not thinking at all, ever.
     
  8. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,393
    The way Bristol has been dealing with the problems around Crawley's work seems deeply shady to me. What's going on with them promoting her TEDx talk that included false information, and that TEDx have now made inaccessible on youtube?

    @Jonathan Edwards

    Do we know if that was a part of SMILE? It seems like LP may be changing somewhat over time and I hear less about people being told to keep it secret than I did. I wonder if they've dropped/down-played that aspect? Also, Parker has argued that this is a myth (warning - Parker speaking is always such a cringe): https://lightningprocess.com/blog/lightning-process-podcast-2-secrets-and-secrecy-of-the-lp/

    [Edited in a summary: PP makes some reasonable points about how it would be impossible to stop every who has been on an LP course from talking about what they experienced, says that it's unfair to say LP is 'secretive' when he has published a book on it, and then rambles on about neuro-nonsense for a while too.]

    It's possible that the reports of 'secrecy' we've had were a result of just a few LP therapists. Who knows?
     
    Last edited: Jun 4, 2019
  9. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,274
    Location:
    London, UK
    I take your point.

    But there certainly seems to be secrecy around the process in that as far as I know what actually goes on has not been published. Normally when evaluating a treatment you do dose response and kinetic studies to establish which components are the active modalities. How do you do that if it is secret?

    Of course in a sense this is true for CBT too. Nobody ever tells us what actually goes on in a CBT session or what 'cognitive strategies' therapists are taught to use.

    I deliberately wrote 'we are told' because I do not know what actually happened, but the point of my letter is that there is reason to flag up concern. Much as Wessely flagged up concern with extrapolating from PACE to service provision because nobody knows what 'poorly trained' therapists might provide in the guise of CBT (which I suppose makes the point above).
     
  10. chrisb

    chrisb Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,602
    The problem with reports of secrecy is that one can never know whether a change in the reported incidence is a result of a change in the practice or greater compliance with the strictures.
     
    DokaGirl, ladycatlover and Trish like this.
  11. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,274
    Location:
    London, UK
    An odd thought occurred to me in relation to SMILE, which I shall post here since the thread is active.

    Dr Crawley said she was not expecting the Lightning Process to work. So an apparent beneficial effect ought not to be due to 'expectation bias'. I think things in reality are more complicated, but it is intriguing.
     
  12. NelliePledge

    NelliePledge Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,145
    Location:
    UK West Midlands
    She said this about herself but presumably the person (I won’t say therapist don’t want to dignify them with that title) delivering the LP element expected it to work and participants likewise- it was being given under auspices of NHS which would have given credibility to patients.
     
  13. Hutan

    Hutan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    26,529
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    There's a difference between the investigator having an expectation bias and the person being given the treatment (and their parents).

    Presumably the consent process screened out the most skeptical of families. Simply being assigned to a treatment (as opposed to a control situation) would suggest that there is a higher chance of a benefit. After all, why would someone go to the trouble of a study if there was no hope at all of a benefit from the treatment?

    And then I would have thought the first hour of the course would set up the kids for a pretty extreme expectation bias.
     
  14. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    9,574
    Location:
    UK
    yes but Prof Crawley says a lot of things, and her acting/presentation skills have improved over the years.
     
  15. Daisybell

    Daisybell Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,628
    Location:
    New Zealand
    My impression is that the people delivering the programme are LP zealots..... so the expectation bias from them is probably very great.
    I was ‘encouraged’ to speak to a LP practitioner on the phone by a friend who had done the programme and been ‘cured’ - certainly the person I spoke to was utterly convinced that LP was the answer to everything, and the manual reports that following the programme can even relieve the symptoms of MS.....
    It’s brainwashing delivered by the brainwashed, with a hefty dose of guilt-tripping if you don’t get better.
     
  16. ME/CFS Skeptic

    ME/CFS Skeptic Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,494
    Location:
    Belgium
    I don't think so. It was in the paper Chalder published on patients' experiences with LP: "Several of the participants highlighted the secrecy aspect as unhelpful and difficult, resulting in prejudice and lack of understanding from people around them."
     
    DokaGirl, inox, JohnTheJack and 9 others like this.
  17. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,274
    Location:
    London, UK
    Yes, now you mention it I remember seeing that as I was checking sources.
     
  18. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,274
    Location:
    London, UK
    Yes, that was my 'in reality more complicated' bit. I keep being reminded how insightful Keith Geraghty's comments on trial design were. It is presumably relevant to 'adaptive pacing' too - which was not expected to work by the people delivering it, even though it was expected to work by the charity supporting the trial.
     
  19. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    8,385
    And who can ever take what EC says at face value, or whether it was said just for rhetorical effect so it sounded all the more impressive that LP (supposedly) did work. When it comes to sleight of word and presentation, I would not take anything for granted.
     
  20. TiredSam

    TiredSam Committee Member

    Messages:
    10,482
    Location:
    Germany
    Advertising fluff. "I never thought another washing powder would get my clothes even whiter ..." If you're selling something it's common practice to express amazement along the lines of "I never would have believed it ..."
     

Share This Page