The biology of coronavirus COVID-19 - including research and treatments

Post‐mortem examination of COVID19 patients reveals diffuse alveolar damage with severe capillary congestion and variegated findings of lungs and other organs suggesting vascular dysfunction
First published: 04 May 2020
https://doi.org/10.1111/his.14134

Abstract
Aims

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) caused by SARS‐CoV‐2 has rapidly evolved into a sweeping pandemic. While its major manifestation is in the respiratory tract, the general extent of organ involvement as well as microscopic changes in the lungs remain insufficiently characterised. Autopsies are essential to elucidate COVID‐19‐associated organ alterations.

Methods
This study reports autopsy findings of 21 COVID‐19 patients hospitalised at the University Hospital Basel and at the Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Switzerland. An in‐corpore technique was performed to ensure optimal staff safety.

Results
The primary cause of death was respiratory failure with exudative diffuse alveolar damage with massive capillary congestion often accompanied by microthrombi despite anticoagulation. Ten cases showed superimposed bronchopneumonia. Further findings included pulmonary embolisms (n=4), alveolar haemorrhage (n=3) and vasculitis (n=1). Pathologies in other organ systems were predominantly attributable to shock; three patients showed signs of generalised thrombotic microangiopathy. Six patients were diagnosed with senile cardiac amyloidosis upon autopsy. Most patients suffered from one or more comorbidities (hypertension, obesity, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus). Additionally, there was an overall predominance of males and individuals with blood group A (81% and 65%, respectively). All relevant histological slides are linked as open‐source scans in supplementary files.

Conclusions
This study provides an overview of post‐mortem findings in COVID‐19 cases, implying that hypertensive, elderly, obese, male individuals with severe cardiovascular comorbidities as well as those with blood group A may have a lower threshold of tolerance for COVID‐19. This provides a pathophysiological explanation for higher mortality rates amongst these patients.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/his.14134

eta:


What Doctors Are Learning From Autopsy Findings of Coronavirus (COVID-19) Patients
236,106 views
•6 May 2020
What Doctors Are Learning From Autopsy Findings of Coronavirus (COVID-19) Patients Once the SARS-CoV-2 virus is deeply embedded in the body, it begins to cause more severe disease. This is where direct attack on other organs that have ACE2 receptors can occur, including heart muscle, kidneys, blood vessels, liver, and the brain. Early findings, including those from multiple autopsy and biopsy reports, show that viral particles can be found not only in the nasal passages and throat, but also in tears, stool, kidneys, liver, pancreas, and heart.

One case report found evidence of viral particles in the CSF, meaning the fluid around the brain. That patient had meningitis. So the virus is sometimes going to all these different organs by means of attaching to the ACE2 receptors that are there, but that’s not even the whole story. Because in some cases, by the time the body’s immune system figures out the body is being invaded, its like unleashing the military to stomp out the virus, and in that process, there’s a ton of collateral damage. This, is what we refer to as the cytokine storm.

When the virus gets into the alveolar cells, meaning the tiny little air sacs within the lungs, it makes a ton of copies of itself, and goes onto invade more cells. The alveoli’s next door neighbor is guess who, yeah, the tiniest blood vessels in our body, capillaries. And the lining of those capillaries is called endothelium, which also have ACE2 receptors. And once the virus invades the capillaries. It means that it serves as the trigger for the onslaught of inflammation AND clotting. And Early autopsy results are also showing widely scattered clots in multiple organs.

In one study from the Netherlands, 1/3rd of hospitalized with COVID-19 got clots despite already being on prophylactic doses of blood thinners. So not only are you getting the inflammation with the cytokine storm, but you’re also forming blood clots, that can travel to other parts of the body, and cause major blockages, effectively damaging those organs.

So wait a minute doc, you’re telling me that this can cause organ damage by 1) Directly attacking organs by their ACE2 receptor? Yup 2) Indirectly attacking organs by way of collateral damage from the cytokine storm? Yup 3) Indirectly cause damage to organs by means of blood clots? yup 4) Indirectly casue damage as a result of low oxygen levels, improper ventilator settings, drug treatments themselves, and/or all of these things combined? Yeah Endothelial cells are more vulnerable to dying in people with preexisting endothelial dysfunction, which is more often associated with being a male, being a smoker, having high blood pressure, diabetes, and obesity.

Blood clots can form and/or travel to other parts of the body. When blood clots travel to the toes, and cause blockages in blood flow there, meaning ischemia or infarction, that can cause gangrene there. And lots of times patients with gangrene require amputation, and “COVID toes” So is antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS), the cause of all these blood clots in patients with severe COVID? Maybe. Some patients with APS have what’s called catastrophic APS, where these patients can have strokes, seizures, heart attacks, kidney failure, ARDS, skin changes like the ones I mentioned.

Viral infectious diseases, particularly those of the respiratory tract, have been reported as being the triggers for CAPS. The pathogenesis is complex and may involve the activation of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR-4), which triggers a cytokine storm, followed by alterations to the endothelium of lung capillaries, which serves as the trigger for inducing the clotting storm. Various factors increase the risk of developing arterial thrombosis. Classically, the cardiovascular-dependent risk factors implicated in clotting have been hypertension, meaning high blood pressure, high levels of cholesterol, smoking, diabetes, age, chemotherapy, and degree of infection.

All of these contribute toward developing arterial thrombosis. A lot of patients with severe COVID-19 have certain labs that resemble DIC, such as increased PT/INR, increased PTT, decreased levels of platelets. But the reason why these COVID patients who developed clots in the study I mentioned earlier, the reason why they don’t have DIC, is actually 2 reasons, one, they weren’t having extensive bleeding, and two, they did not have low fibrinogen levels. And if its truly DIC, you would have both of those things.
 
Last edited:
What Doctors Are Learning From Autopsy Findings of Coronavirus (COVID-19) Patients
236,106 views
•6 May 2020

The slightly elevated cytokines (IL-6) etc are typical of acute infections with some inflammation and don't suggest a "cytokine storm" syndrome, where cytokine levels are extremely high (hyperinflammation). See this commentary also: https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/86021

The vascular dysfunction and clotting problems isn't merely due to damage to the blood vessels, it can also be due to dysregulation of the angiotensin-renin system, of which ACE2 plays a key role. The problem isn't merely the formation of clots (due to damage of the respiratory epithelium), but problems with the clearance of those clots. There are other respiratory infections that lead to similar lung damage that don't result in the same clotting problems seen - so the problem isn't merely due to the damage done.
 
New call for research on the risk factors, transmission and prevalence of coronavirus
A new call for research proposals on the risk factors, transmission and prevalence of the COVID-19 virus SARS-CoV-2, has been launch by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR).

These two highlight notices form part of a rolling call for research proposals on COVID-19, run by NIHR and UKRI.
https://www.ukri.org/news/new-call-for-research-on-the-risk-factors-of-coronavirus/
 
More evidence that SARS-CoV-19 human pandemic started earlier than thought. Mutation clock suggests 95% confidence window starts on September 13th 2019 and ends December 7 and there is no evidence it started in Wuhan or even in China according to Dr Peter Forster of the University of Cambridge ... and I believe him as I think I caught it on Nov 27th at the dentist.



See also article.
https://www.sciencetimes.com/articl...ted-early-september-casting-doubts-origin.htm
 
Autopsy Findings and Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With COVID-19: A Prospective Cohort Study

(small study with 12 patients)

"The high incidence of thromboembolic events suggests an important role of COVID-19–induced coagulopathy.

Further studies are needed to investigate the molecular mechanism and overall clinical incidence of COVID-19–related death, as well as possible therapeutic interventions to reduce it."

The researchers suggest to consider blood thinners as part of the Covid therapy
 
The high incidence of thromboembolic events suggests an important role of COVID-19–induced coagulopathy.
In a press conference one of the authors said that a quarantine of infected persons would be detrimental for them, because moving around and sports would be important to prevent this.
 
Do patients have to be severly ill with Covid to get thromboembolism?

The study includes 2 patients that didn't die at a hospital. I don't know if that means they weren't ill enough or just didn't make it there in time.

Interestingly, the leading pathologist, Prof. Klaus Püschel, doesn't believe SarsCov2 is that serious. He doubts that there even will be notable excess mortality.

Maybe he just has a different view on things as a coroner/pathologist but his findings are being used by lockdown-critics.
 
Do patients have to be severly ill with Covid to get thromboembolism?

Interestingly, the leading pathologist, Prof. Klaus Püschel, doesn't believe SarsCov2 is that serious. He doubts that there even will be notable excess mortality.

Maybe he just has a different view on things as a coroner/pathologist but his findings are being used by lockdown-critics.

I would imagine they would at least feel off colour enough not to want to go for a cross country run!
Püschel sounds as if he is one of these people who would say the sinking of the Titanic was not too bad because at least some people got into the lifeboats. I wonder what the motivation for this is - not wanting to be proved wrong having misjudged at first, or some sort of disdain for fellow human beings.
 
Püschel had previously disregarded our CDC's recommendation to not conduct autopsies and found - no surprise - most deceased were of old age with pre existing conditions.

I never understood what the "value" of that previous finding was, this was known from China since January. But it was used by lockdown-critics to make their point.

I have no scientific background whatsoever, but as a layman I feel like there is something strange going on with researchers everywhere going public on their own enmeshing their data with politics. Or that was always the case and I didn't know.

(Edited/partly deleted for correction since I was refering to a reposted, not original source)
 
Last edited:
Dr. Annalisa Malara, an intensive care physician in Codogno, southeast of Milan, who diagnosed Italy’s first case of the outbreak in February, said there was still no clear understanding of why the virus and its effects lingered so long.

“Lack of energy and the sensation of broken bones” are common, she said, adding that fatigue often lingered “even after the more intense symptoms are gone.”
But even some of the infected who have avoided pneumonia describe a maddeningly persistent and unpredictable illness, with unexpected symptoms. Bones feel broken. The senses dull. Stomachs are constantly upset. There are good days and then bad days without apparent rhyme nor reason.

That description of symptoms could have written by patients on ME/CFS social media channels.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/10/world/europe/coronavirus-italy-recovery.html

It's a bit sad that people don't always realize that the persistent symptoms part could very well be the same illness as ME/CFS is in many cases.
 
Last edited:
Here in NZ, there have been three recent positive test results in nurses who have got to the end of self-isolation (14 days) due to possible exposure, and then been tested as a routine precaution before returning to work. So the incubation period seems to be sometimes longer than 14 days...
 
Here in NZ, there have been three recent positive test results in nurses who have got to the end of self-isolation (14 days) due to possible exposure, and then been tested as a routine precaution before returning to work. So the incubation period seems to be sometimes longer than 14 days...

Could be that the virus is still detected but perhaps not transmissible. There were also some reports that the virus stayed on various surfaces for several weeks, but now they say it doesn't seem likely to be transmissible from surfaces for very long.

I find it quite frustrating to read all these conflicting news articles about things you'd think should have been figured out by now (in some sense it's all too familiar when you are used to reading articles about ME/CFS). Obviously it's a new virus, but the way things are reported gives the impression that people have never studied how respiratory viruses behave before and now a couple of months in there still seems to be no consensus on anything. I think it's sadly no wonder people resort to conspiracy theories when the information is this conflicting and poor.
 
Back
Top Bottom