Take your pick: Have you read the paper? If yes: You obviously haven't understood the paper. If you have: These points have all been comprehensively addressed before. If that doesn't work: Your view is due to (insert malevolent motive here). I'm prepared to be corrected, but I think that's all they've been able to come up with for the last few decades, so I'll be amazed if they come up with anything different now. Perhaps "You are now blocked" - does that count as a response?