1. Sign our petition calling on Cochrane to withdraw their review of Exercise Therapy for CFS here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 15th April 2024 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

Tell Your Representative to SUPPORT INCREASED FUNDING FOR POST-VIRAL-DISEASE RESEARCH INTO ME/CFS!

Discussion in 'Advocacy Action Alerts' started by Emily Taylor, Jul 17, 2020.

  1. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    12,466
    Location:
    Canada
    I still haven't seen any work coming out of the CDC in the last several years that even amounts to $100K. I'm not sure that's a good idea without there being oversight on what they do with it, which appears to be nothing. The only work products I have seen in the last 5 years are a small update to their guidelines and the horrible evidence review that basically sets everything back 5 years. The NICE committee did a better job thanks and only thanks to the presence of patient experts who could uphold the process.

    The committee needs to be brought back. Nothing is holding them accountable right now, the community discussions are a joke, they do not allow for any oversight at all and the patients are the only ones even attempting to. Blank checks won't cut it, they need to be told what to do with it, they clearly can't figure that out by themselves.
     
    cfsandmore and alktipping like this.
  2. Yessica

    Yessica Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    374
    Thanks that was very easy to do. Thank you for posting and Solve M.E. for making it so easy. And of course Senator Markey and everyone that advocated to make this possible!
     
    Sisyphus, alktipping, sebaaa and 3 others like this.
  3. Wilhelmina Jenkins

    Wilhelmina Jenkins Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    220
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA, USA
    Unless I am mistaken, the major ask for the increased funding is for a serious epidemiological study - something that we have needed for a very long time. CDC is very different from NIH. The usual with NIH is to appropriate a bulk amount of money and allow NIH to use it in whatever way they feel is appropriate. (There are exceptions for health crises like AIDS or COVID-19. Not us, so far.) With CDC, Congress directly says what the funds should be used for and they are the people who hold CDC responsible. CDC takes the words used by Congress seriously.

    I think that it is unlikely that Congress will appropriate the funds this year, but I think that it is important that we continue to push for a decent epidemiological study and CDC would be the appropriate agency to do that.

    And of course I agree with you that what has been accomplished by CDC for us has been disappointing, to say the least. I assume that this forum posted the letter from ME Action expressing that disappointment with CDC and NIH as well.

    http://www.meaction.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/MEAction-Letter-to-NIH-CDC.pdf
     
    cfsandmore, sebaaa, Joh and 9 others like this.
  4. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    12,466
    Location:
    Canada
    Ah OK that could be good. As long as there are clear instructions it should be put to good use. It's blank checks that are never accounted for that are problematic, or an annual budget no one knows how it's used, aside from the occasional community call.
     

Share This Page