I often quote POTS to show how dysfunctional medicine is. It's an illness with objective symptoms and a diagnostic test, yet nobody takes it seriously.
I think doctors use some kind of misguided instinctual understanding of the nature of illness to decide if an illness is "real" or not. They don't necessarily care about biomarkers or objective symptoms. I'll cite an anecdote that i think is relevant:
Over the years, i saw many neurologists, many of them being considered really high level. Almost all of them consider ME to be a fake illness, not to be taken seriously. They didn't care that i had POTS either. But for some reason, they took my sleep disorder (which is an ME symptom) seriously. My sleep cycle lasts 25 hours instead of 24 so i keep shifting forward infinitely, and half of my life I'm sleeping during the day. For some reason, neurologists can tell that this is a "real" symptom. From my perspective, i don't really get why. If my fatigue or cognitive impairment is not real, cant they just claim that i sleep like this because i have a poor sleep hygiene or something? Or a psychological disorder? I would think so, but for some reason they don't do that. From my POV, there is no difference between this symptom and the others (aside from it being far less disabling), but apparently for doctors there is a world of difference.
Despite having no biomarker or objective symptoms, It is a rare illness that neurologists take seriously https://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/OC_Exp.php?lng=EN&Expert=73267 they even made a drug for it!
For me, it's like the least disabling symptom i have and i really can't see why they would take this one seriously and not the others.
What I'm saying here, is that it's not as simple as ME not being taken seriously because it lacks a biomarker or objective symptoms. We should dig deeper into this and figure what is really going on. Maybe there is a way we could have a dialogue with doctors, as unlikely as that sounds. I find that the ME charities have never tried to dig deeper into this sort of thing and restricted themselves to very surface level thinking. There is never any real constructive dialogue, half of the time they are yelling "take us seriously!", the other half sponsoring quack treatments or very low level researchers. I feel that the people leading our charities do not have any real insight or understanding as to why doctors don't take us seriously (not to mention how quality research is done but that's another topic)
I know in marketing there is the need to get people to relate eg if giving a figure giving something ballpark to give a sense of what that magnitude means.
I hate to say it but women feeling awful or collapsing is just a bigotry people are happy to write off and not try to imagine could happen to them. I think it’s that simple for many. Having said that the sleep thing has been probably the aspect that has made me most rejected and unacceptable to laypersons and medics but those weren’t neurologists
Maybe the treatment (I wasn’t aware there was one) helps as it means they can be in that easier ‘do their job mode’ where there is a drug and then a follow up and dosing etc
one weird thing to note is that I was taught that most people’s circadian rhythm is nearer to 25 than 24hrs. That’s obviously different to the sleep disorder in symptoms, reality and almost certainly measurable somewhere in your body, but I’m intrigued by what it is they think they can see and if/how that actually distinguishes between the two.
Last edited: