Paul Garner on Long Covid and ME/CFS - BMJ articles and other media.

Did he have Covid and long Covid or did he have ME/CFS?
This is the problem with the 'hurry' for people to get an ME/CFS diagnosis. Most descriptions of ME/CFS begin with something like "ME/CFS (Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome) is a chronic, debilitating illness characterized by profound fatigue, post-exertional malaise, and multi-system symptoms that significantly impair daily functioning."

Chronic is the key word here. If you 'recover' a couple of months after a diagnosis, then presumably the diagnosis was wrong(?)
 
This is the problem with the 'hurry' for people to get an ME/CFS diagnosis. Most descriptions of ME/CFS begin with something like "ME/CFS (Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome) is a chronic, debilitating illness characterized by profound fatigue, post-exertional malaise, and multi-system symptoms that significantly impair daily functioning."

Chronic is the key word here. If you 'recover' a couple of months after a diagnosis, then presumably the diagnosis was wrong(?)
He says that he was told he met the Canadian Consensus Criteia for ME. He wasn’t diagnosed. He really should have got himself referred if he was concerned, but then he recovered so I guess there wasn’t time.
 
He says that he was told he met the Canadian Consensus Criteia for ME. He wasn’t diagnosed.
So he can't say he recovered from ME.
Unless there is a foolproof biomarker test involved, people can meet the diagnostic criteria for all sorts of things.
They don't then go around claiming they've recovered from if they get better, and therefore other people with it can as well.
 
And yet, he does. It’s fascinating.
Same guy who would personally insist, along with his whole coterie, that someone meeting ME/CFS clinical criteria means nothing, and yet his whole argument rests entirely on that. Self-diagnosis, too.

Ridicule has no guest limit, once you've got one inside they're all invited to the party.
 
Last edited:
Same guy who would personally, along with his whole coterie, that meeting the clinical criteria means nothing, and yet his whole argument rests entirely on that. Self-diagnosis, too.

Ridicule has no guest limit, once you've got one inside they're all invited to the party.
It’s cognitive dissonance but squared? Cubed?
 
Back
Top Bottom