Paul Garner on Long Covid and ME/CFS - BMJ articles and other media.

His perpetual repetition, each time with added layers of nonsense, is seriously weird. I don't think I had heard before his claim that women get ME/CFS more because we ruminate more. I wonder what he'll invent next to boost his self aggrandising claims of superiority.

Please, Prof. Garner, go and do something harmless like cultivating parsnips. They're very tasty when roasted.
 
It's interesting to listen to some of the narrative as he gives it in retrospect. There was the person who helped him, making the initial claim that he certainly couldn't have ME/CFS because he was too old and the wrong sex. Later he agrees that this isn't true but explains this was a clever way of shifting him. Subsequently he claims that women may ruminate more.

Again noting his sister had ME/CFS. Raelen Agle also had mother and grandmother with ME/CFS. Yet he doesn't "see it as a genetic something" (47:59). RA thinks it's just about "being a woman, about our habits our behaviours, our way of dealing with emotions" :rolleyes:

PG comments about "agency being taken away" by genetics and "a lot of fuss being made about a study in the UK" (DecodeME). He then partly mischaracterises about genetic destiny, before settling back on influence on risk. "Of course it does play on people's minds and that's something you can't fix and of course that leads to rumination."

Also that he had some concerning unexplained symptoms in the year prior to the pandemic. He was invalidated by his doctor.

"'Well it's just stress.' Well I burst into tears then because I thought he wasn't validating me. He said 'well there you are, there you go.'"

It's hard to understand how he tries to rationalise his experience of PEM at 09:00.

[Feeling better at 12 weeks he does a HIIT class] "… felt sort of all right and then the next day I was completely floored for about a week. It was the worst sort of pains that I had. I can certainly understand how people develop these ideas about, you know, you have this period where you over-exert and then you're knocked out… for days."

It sounds as if he thinks this is a single or relatively restricted few episode(s) that people then simply assume is continuing lifelong, rather than being their actual daily experience?

There's the glycaemic overdose where he "scoffed the rest of the cake". The next morning "I felt really awful…"

Interestingly at 31:32 is the suggestion that BPS researchers might be mind-body dualists —

"Even talking about mind-body approaches. You know that is putting these two things as separate and they're not really separate you know? And research looks at cog… CBT and graded exercise therapy as if they're separate, but that's part of the dualism."

On the PACE trial he notes it is much maligned but that patient charities were on the committee, which is somewhat unfortunately framed as the "execution committee".

A segment on the NICE guidelines begins at 34:47.

"The methods were… the analyses were not… we would have failed a masters student if they'd handed them in. They were very very badly done. I think they were over-influenced by a very strong biomedical lobby — an ideology that wanted to ban exercise and ban CBT."

"The word 'recovery' does not occur anywhere in the guideline. […] I mean I'm my own experience where somebody flipped my expectations and suddenly I started getting better, really. I mean I'm not saying that happens for everyone…"

"And the people with severe ME are to be kept in bed and away from light and strong smells. And, you know this is common sense that this doesn't really help."
How can this man spout this unscientific nonsense while having a scientific degree? Really baffling.
 
I don’t think we are to put personal comments but what I will say is that now I have a lot more “tick” on my list of assumptions.

Bet we have the same GP.
 
On Action for ME Facebook
NICE would probably just be very confused at this mention of walking being banned. Which it obviously isn't. What a silly thing to say.

I think what we are seeing is the process of radicalization, the same that leads people down conspiracy fantasy holes. It begins with finding a crowd that always validates what they think, and eventually lies, truth and bullshit blur together to the point where he can make stuff up like this and find nothing wrong with it. And in this case they have the additional validation of the medical profession, which acts as a similar validation as the rich interests that are often behind conspiracy fantasies, giving legitimacy to blatant quackery.

He might as well be yelling about chemtrails, there's really not much difference here.
 
How can this man spout this unscientific nonsense while having a scientific degree? Really baffling.
It only ever gets more absurd in that his expertise was evidence-based medicine.

Which says everything about why evidence-based medicine is such a disaster.

Not much different from the professional 'skeptics' who end up gushing about things that may as well be medical astrology. Humans are truly at the top of the weird chain.
 
Did we miss PG reply to Rob Wust re Questionnaire regarding PEM?

"Post exertional malaise is a symptom generated in the brain. Graded exposure therapy accompanied by a brain-body explanation helps recovery. Belief it is a solely biomedical phenomenon influences unconscious beliefs, increases uncertainty and can worsen symptoms".

 
Back
Top Bottom