Maybe he thinks PVFS is just fatigue, or he is disagreeing with people who suggested he had PVFS because those people viewed it as fatigue.
Very frustrating he is still being adamant it's not ME or CFS. He was the same guy who wrote to BMJ blog post saying that the suggestion he had post viral fatigue syndrome was the worst suggestion he had been given.Huffington Post UK: Coronavirus Is Leaving People With Serious Fatigue - What Can You Do About It?
Interviews with professor Paul Garner from Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine and dr. Charles Shepherd from the ME Association on Covid-19, post viral fatigue and activity management.
While we don’t know for sure the causes of CFS/ME, there are a number of theories about what might trigger it – one of which is viral infections.
The ME Association has noticed that people with diagnosed CFS/ME are experiencing a “significant exacerbation” of their CFS/ME symptoms after having the coronavirus. However, Professor Garner believes we should be cautious about calling it post-viral fatigue syndrome for now.
“The virus, and the body’s response to it, clearly causes a myriad of symptoms,” he tells HuffPost UK in an email – some are similar to symptoms of other viral infections, some are unusual and some are similar to the symptoms of CFS/ME. “As things stand, by the UK definition, this is not chronic fatigue syndrome or ME because a) we know the cause and b) it hasn’t gone on for four months.”
Ah cool. So everyone who developed ME following a confirmed viral infection can now be taken off the blacklist and finally receive competent medical care? And I guess we should do that systematically from now on. Whew, that would save so many lives!we know the cause
“The virus, and the body’s response to it, clearly causes a myriad of symptoms,” he tells HuffPost UK in an email – some are similar to symptoms of other viral infections, some are unusual and some are similar to the symptoms of CFS/ME. “As things stand, by the UK definition, this is not chronic fatigue syndrome or ME because a) we know the cause and b) it hasn’t gone on for four months.
This matters, says Prof Garner, because “some doctors and families are dismissing people who are quite unwell with ‘post-viral exhaustion’” when it fatigue could still be a symptom of the coronavirus itself.
“If you have people at home assuming they have a diagnosis of ‘post viral exhaustion’, with weird symptoms that may actually be an indicator of the development of severe disease, they may discount them and not seek care that could be important to save their lives,” he says.
says Prof Garner, because “some doctors and families are dismissing people who are quite unwell with ‘post-viral exhaustion’” when it fatigue could still be a symptom of the coronavirus itself.
That's not what he says though, he claims that it is patients who will ignore their symptoms: "may discount them and not seek care that could be important to save their lives"
That comment suggests how out-of-touch he really is.
This comes across as a backhanded dismissal of the importance of post-viral syndromes (and CFS & ME).
Doctors should be taking such symptoms seriously regardless of the cause! But that is not what he is implying.
I agree the next paragraph he is saying patients might discount them, but I read that as following on from being dismissed by doctors or family members.
Yes, I went back and looked at the article again and realised my mistake, so deleted that post. Surprised you managed to read it in the 2 minutes it was up!
That's my very brief window of clarity for the year!
edit - would you like me to delete the response and then this post to tidy up?
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/014107689108400224"Post-infectious fatigue syndrome (PIFS): This is a subtype of CFS which either follows an infection or is associated with a current infection"
Could well be true, but when you do interviews for the media (as opposed to in private circles), your comments are justifiably scrutinised. And you have a particular onus on you to be accurate when you're not just presenting yourself as a patient but also as a medical expert.There are things about Paul Garner's comments that make me think he harbours some poor views about PVFS/ME/etc, but if his symptoms are continuing (or did he say he'd recovered?) he's probably having an emotionally difficult time, and maybe not on his best behaviour. When I first fell ill and had my doctor raise the possibility of ME (though in a way that implied I should be able to avoid getting it) I instinctively disassociated myself from it and was confident that I'd recover.
If he's been surrounded by shitty views about ME/CFS for his career (which seems likely) then I can understand him really not wanting currently difficult and scary symptoms to be seen as a part of that, even if that leads him to say things that get my heckles up. He probably sees his comments in a very different light to us.
Could well be true, but when you do interviews for the media (as opposed to in private circles), your comments are justifiably scrutinised. And you have a particular onus on you to be accurate when you're not just presenting yourself as a patient but also as a medical expert.
I disagree -he says:
"This matters, says Prof Garner, because “some doctors and families are dismissing people who are quite unwell with ‘post-viral exhaustion’” when it fatigue could still be a symptom of the coronavirus itself."