This sounds remarkably similar to what has been going on at the "ME clinic" in Göteborg in Sweden: https://www.s4me.info/threads/swede...e-to-avoid-the-diagnosis-me.45927/post-674111While formally claiming to have separated ME from functional disorders, access to documents shows that the practice is quite the opposite. At one center (Center for Functional Disorders), 41 out of 44 patients with an ME diagnosis have been recoded as functional disorders. Since 2019, four centers have had zero patients registered with an ME diagnosis and have not made the diagnosis themselves.
Post-infectious clinic that will open up in April struggles to find doctors who are interested in a position. So far, only 3 doctors have been submitting an application.
Doctors have stand alone clinics in Norway, and Sweden already have a «team» setup in primary health where the doctors work with physios, nurses etc. There was a doctor’s office in my old town that shared space with a physio clinic, they were very happy with the setup.I am not surprised. Why would a doctor want to take up a job in a clinic with an airy-fairy name that sounds as if it might be closed next month? And why would they want to join a clinic full of physios and psychologists? This is why the 'community rehab' model is a dead duck.
Doctors have stand alone clinics in Norway, and Sweden already have a «team» setup in primary health where the doctors work with physios, nurses etc. There was a doctor’s office in my old town that shared space with a physio clinic, they were very happy with the setup.
Probably had Myasthenia Gravis, but the tests back then were inconclusive. Got diagnosed with Ulcerative Colitis in 2024, put on Infliximab and both conditions improved. Trying to sort out dosing.Anyone can summarize? Thanks
![]()
Anders slapp rullstolen efter 20 år: ”Det känns som jag fått mitt liv tillbaka”
En mystisk autoimmun sjukdom gjorde så att Anders Pettersson gradvis förlorade styrkan i kroppens muskler. I över 20 år var han rullstolsburen – tills en medicin mot tarmsjukdom ändrade hans liv totalt.www.hemtrevligt.se
First, the diagnosis cannot be ruled out on an individual level. There is no test that can say that a person does not have ME. The fact that a somatic diagnosis cannot be ruled out is a serious weakness and should worry us.
Second, the boundaries are arbitrary. There are over 20 sets of criteria for ME [6], and according to the WHO, there is still no consensus on the use of any of them [7]. The same person may therefore be diagnosed by one doctor but not by another [8, 9]. When the diagnosis is left to the patient’s narrative and the doctor’s preferences, we end up with a diagnostic lottery.
The symptoms of ME are also very common. Long-term fatigue, pain and sleep problems occur in large parts of the population. If you have one first, the other will often follow. This also applies to the so-called cardinal symptom, PEM, or worsening after activity.
The phenomenon is reported in depression and MS [2], but also in fibromyalgia [12]. Over half of those with health anxiety report the same. In bodily distress syndrome [13, 14] the proportion is as high as 90 percent.
When we treat the ME diagnosis as a biologically confirmed disease, we begin to reason incorrectly. We reject treatments that actually work because they are not tailored to a biological mechanism that we still haven’t found – even after 50 years of research [15].
She makes some salient points about inconsistent diagnostic practices and too much emphasis on poor research, but seems to be completely unaware of the hypocrisy of referring to BDS while criticising ME/CFS. She also claims that psychological diagnoses somehow can rule out ME/CFS, as if those are possible to prove.We owe it to patients to be honest about what an ME diagnosis actually is. A diagnosis that cannot be refuted does not protect the patients. It only protects the diagnosis.
I have no idea why someone with no medical or scientific training is pontificating on this topic.Live Landmark argues that the concept of a diagnosis of ME/CFS is medically and scientifically inappropriate because it can’t be proven with a test.
I have no idea why someone with no medical or scientific training is pontificating on this topic.