inox
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Sigmund Olafsen is a 'civil engineer / senior researcher in acoustics. He is also a relative'. He also have written some good articles about PACE and highlightning it's faults, mainly focusing on that the data never supported the researchers claims, in a very factual style.
April 24 he had another good chronicle in 'Dagens medisin' (=todays medicine):
"ME treatment needs to enter a new track" [norwegian - google english]
It's not really anything new in this piece, as such. But his writing style and authority as a researcher himself, in another field, still making an impact. As can be seen by the responses in the comments field... Nina Andresen, the psychologist and ex-patient that have written several negative pieces about ME-patients is there - as is several others who have a hard time swallowing there is no data to support their claims.
April 24 he had another good chronicle in 'Dagens medisin' (=todays medicine):
"ME treatment needs to enter a new track" [norwegian - google english]
TWO IMPORTANT TRACKS. I think we should thank those who have researched cognitive behavioral therapy and graded training as treatment for ME, for their efforts. There was never any result, but it is allowed for a researcher to make a mistake.But we cannot use up limited resources in the future by continuing on unsuccessful projects. And we cannot risk patients' lives and health on alternative treatment. Now we have to end with claims that things work without it being able to be supported by objective, freely available raw data.
It's not really anything new in this piece, as such. But his writing style and authority as a researcher himself, in another field, still making an impact. As can be seen by the responses in the comments field... Nina Andresen, the psychologist and ex-patient that have written several negative pieces about ME-patients is there - as is several others who have a hard time swallowing there is no data to support their claims.