I'm not sure if it's just a general consequence of politicians promising things that they don't plan to deliver, but it seems common for politicians to make statements about increasing funding/taking action on ME/CFS, and then it going nowhere. It could be that there's some behind the scenes pressure from medical organisations or people in bureaucracies who don't want to give legitimacy to ME/CFS by giving it funding (which is an opinion that's sometimes expressed openly by some people).
For a variety of reasons (mainly stigma) researchers with talent do not want to go anywhere near ME/CFS. Throwing money at the problem won't do much, unless you set up an in house study (like the NIH is doing) and sort of "pressure" people to work on it and set up very high standards. But that requires a specialized person who understands these things and wants to coordinate a team of capable scientists to figure out the problem. Politicians have no clue about any of this, so they just give funding to the clinics (which might seem to them like a sensible thing to do) because chances are that's what their advisors are telling them.
To make a hypothetical example, if we had the belief that cancer ought to be cured with chinese herbs, what politicians would probably do is give funding to chinese herb clinics. They have no background in science so you cannot really expect much. ME/CFS lands in this weird place where by saying words like "rehabilitation" "multidisciplinary care" and "treating the symptoms" you can get away with doing fuck all.
Science in medicine needs to change from within.
Last edited: