Samuel
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
> It was reported by RNZ as a quote from a MoH spokesperson, that there is not sufficient evidence to suggest that lower dosing will mitigate adverse reactions to the vaccine. It is correct that no trials have been conducted into reactions to lower dosing for pwME. However, in studies that have been conducted into fractionated dosing, reduced doses appear to reduce reactogenicity (adverse side effects).
this comment by the charity reinforces my lack of being entirely convinced that the officials "completely understand" m.e. and other diseases not being studied. it really felt like boilerplate.
not concerned at this time /for myself/ about being able to enter shops as i am bedridden (also not same country). i want studies done someplace in the entire world for all of us to make an informed decision and i don't think it is too much to ask?
i am bedridden and have non normal immune system and if i get worse, i will have no care at all. no food no medicine. i want to be vaccinated very much not least because my vaccinated carer is taking more and more risks, feeling invulnerable, and has never been one for hygeine or cleaning, washing hands more than a couple of seconds before food prep, etc.
the numbers on the survey are too small but do not look good. i need some source of information that is reasonably reliable to make the decision and if so which vaccine to do. and small doses if that is a good idea.
> This was based on Professor Warren Tate’s advice that people with ME/CFS who often experience severe food allergies, chemical hypersensitivities, are prone to frequent debilitating relapses and have a significant compromised level of activity, may be at a higher risk to adverse side effects to vaccination in comparison to people with ME/CFS who do not have these extra dimensions of the illness.
i have a significant compromised level of activity. i want studies, low doses, etc. i am really concerned.
this comment by the charity reinforces my lack of being entirely convinced that the officials "completely understand" m.e. and other diseases not being studied. it really felt like boilerplate.
not concerned at this time /for myself/ about being able to enter shops as i am bedridden (also not same country). i want studies done someplace in the entire world for all of us to make an informed decision and i don't think it is too much to ask?
i am bedridden and have non normal immune system and if i get worse, i will have no care at all. no food no medicine. i want to be vaccinated very much not least because my vaccinated carer is taking more and more risks, feeling invulnerable, and has never been one for hygeine or cleaning, washing hands more than a couple of seconds before food prep, etc.
the numbers on the survey are too small but do not look good. i need some source of information that is reasonably reliable to make the decision and if so which vaccine to do. and small doses if that is a good idea.
> This was based on Professor Warren Tate’s advice that people with ME/CFS who often experience severe food allergies, chemical hypersensitivities, are prone to frequent debilitating relapses and have a significant compromised level of activity, may be at a higher risk to adverse side effects to vaccination in comparison to people with ME/CFS who do not have these extra dimensions of the illness.
i have a significant compromised level of activity. i want studies, low doses, etc. i am really concerned.
Last edited: