My feeling is we need to propose a process to help reach high quality research proposals and if they are generated have some money available or likely to be achieve.
I agree that the Japanese PET study should be replicated.
I can set up a private subforum for some people to work up ideas if there is interest.
I can set up a private subforum for some people to work up ideas if there is interest.
Interesting discussion.
Back in the world I was at one time responsible for
Is it a burlesque dancer from Belize?All will be revealed - loose finger![]()
Is it a burlesque dancer from Belize?![]()
Oh well doing research will have to do. It sounds more useful for this discussion than my idea.I'm intrigued?
A quick skim through the MRC website suggests that most grants will only be available to UK researchers, though I'm happy to be corrected by more knowledgeable folks.Can research groups from abroad apply for a grant from MRC?
I think this is a promising idea. I also think that it should be looked at older publications as well.That!
I completely agree. There are new researchs to be undertaken, but there are also a lot of small studies showing interesting things that are of no scientific value because they used small cohorts and were not replicated. I think identifying the most promising unreplicated studies could be a good start.