This is interesting, because it's not like dementia either. I once experienced some of those symptoms due to a severe B12 deficiency. There's sometimes a comical quality when you look back on things you've done, misplaced, or misunderstood because of brain fog; with dementia, if you can remember the incidents at all, the nature and scale of the gaps is plain scary.
When we're talking about how to communicate care needs for very severely ill people in hospital, this is so risky an area that it might best be avoided. We know from Maeve's inquest that at least one person has already made assumptions about brain fog equalling lack of mental capacity, and I feel strongly that that can't be assumed.
Capacity in people with severe ME can't even be assessed with a test, because the instrument itself would cause lasting impairment. It would have to be assessed on the pattern over time, observed by someone skilled and experienced. Those skills probably only exist in family members, partners and home carers, and the opinions would likely be doubted because the individuals are 'unqualified'.
agreed.
And you know it IS interesting Kitty, because now i'm thinking about my cog difficulties in terms of mental capacity.... it NOT actually that i
cant understand, its that the environment/manner of presentation amkes it impossible. And clearly i need to stop describing it as being
unable to comprehend but rather when i at my worst in need certain accommodations to
enable me to comprehend!
So for me at least (and i am not nearly as bad as very severe with feeding issues but am severe as classed by NICe & MEA), but for me the problem can be managed, to a degree, by slowing everything down to a ludicrously slow pace. And making sure i am lying flat, with zero sensory stimulus.
So its not really accurate to say i cant comprehend, full stop. Because actually the problem is the rate at which the info is coming.
for example... if carer wants to ask me if i want a drink she has to say "thirsty?"
& give me probably a full minute or 2 to understand what the word thirsty means.
Then repeat another word - "tea"? & then again give me at least a minute or 2 to work out what 'tea' is, & then if i shake my head slightly she waill then ask 'water?'.... and so it goes on.
She said its visible on my face - frowning in intentse concentration & confusion while i figure out what a word means, & then she sees me understand it & my eyes go wide with comprehension, & my face light up when she's said something i want & i work out what it means.
But if she were to say "are you thristy do you want a cup of tea?" i wouldnt understand... i might catch one word but the rest is gibberish. If i catch 'thristy' then all well & good, but if its 'cup' or 'want' then we've no hope.
Same with reading, if one word is presented at a time, in the same way i described, then i can understand - eventually. But if i try to read a sentence i cant manage to separate out one word from another - the visual field is too cluttered with other words. Also i cant hold onto the concept of one sentence while reading another, there is no working memory. So one thing has to be fully established before moving on to the next a little later.
None of it is possible if there is also sensory stimulus going on, so its impossible to understand the word question 'thirsty?', if there is any sound whatsoever.
Obviously this is only when in deep PEM crash, i am reading this thread & understanding, which is why people generally dont believe me when i talk about my cognitive difficulties. But I can go from this to that in space of 5 mins.
So its not actually a mental capacity issue, but a problem with the environment & the manner in which info is presented. Which would presumably be why they didnt understand why Maeve could make her own decisions but said she needed her mother to stay with her to communicate for her!
This phenomena can be seen at a lower level in me when i am well rested, whent i can
either stand up for a couple of mins
or understand whats being said. I simply cannot do both. But if i go lie down i can 'miraculously' understand again.
Same with sensory stimulus - its assumed to be about distraction, but it seems to me much more about not having enough 'gas' to fuel both processing the stimulus/standing up, AND thinking.
I dont know how that fits into the signalling thing, but i imagine it would.